ZHU CTLR EXPERIENCED OPERROR AT FL230 WHEN ACFT ACCEPTED DIRECT CLRNC BUT THEN DEVIATED AROUND WX AND CONFLICTED WITH TFC AT AN ADJACENT SECTOR.
Synopsis
ZHU CTLR EXPERIENCED OPERROR AT FL230 WHEN ACFT ACCEPTED DIRECT CLRNC BUT THEN DEVIATED AROUND WX AND CONFLICTED WITH TFC AT AN ADJACENT SECTOR.
Narrative
ACR X WAS ASKED IF HE COULD ACCEPT DIRECT GLAND FOR THE ARR. THE PLT SAID AFFIRMATIVE. I CLRED HIM DIRECT GLAND DSNDING TO 10000 FT. ABOUT 2 1/2 MINS LATER; I REALIZED HE DID NOT TURN. WHEN I ASKED WHERE HE WAS GOING; HE SAID HE WAS HDG 050 DEGS AROUND WX. GLAND INTXN WAS ON A HDG OF ABOUT 95-100 DEGS; THEREFORE; HE WAS 45-50 DEGS OFF COURSE. A MIN OR TWO LATER; I LOST SEPARATION WITH A CPR JET. THIS OCCURRENCE HAS BEEN LISTED AS A CTLR ERROR. THERE WAS A PLTDEV PRIOR TO THE ERROR AND IT WAS A CAUSAL FACTOR. THIS DEV TO MY KNOWLEDGE; ISN'T BEING RPTED BY ZHU. THE WX WAS SEVERE WITH TSTMS. I TOLD THE CTLR AT THE ADJACENT SECTOR OF THE WX PROBS IN MY AIRSPACE. HE TOLD HIS SUPVR HE WOULD HAVE TO HOLD ACFT. HIS SUPVR SAID; 'NO; KEEP SENDING THE ACFT.' I ALSO TOLD MY SUPVR; 20 MINS PRIOR TO THE DEAL; OF THE IMPENDING WX. SINCE NO ASSISTANCE WAS BEING GIVEN; IT WAS A 'FLY BY THE SEAT OF YOUR PANTS' SIT. THE REGION ORIGINALLY WAS LOOKING AT THIS AS A PLTDEV. HOWEVER; WHEN I ASKED ACR X WHERE HE WAS GOING -- WHEN HE TOLD ME; I RESPONDED WITH 'OK.' THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE I COULD DO. THE PLT EVIDENTLY FELT HE HAD TO DEVIATE AROUND WX. THE PLT WAS ASSIGNED 16000 FT. I DID NOT RECEIVE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DUE TO BEING STEPPED ON BY A GA ACFT. I LOST SEPARATION WITH AN ACFT ABOUT 15 MI N OF MY AIRSPACE DUE TO THE DEV OF ACR X. MISSING OR NOT RECEIVING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF MY CLRNC FOR ACR X TO AMEND ALT TO 16000 FT WAS ALSO A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR FOR LOSS OF SEPARATION MINIMA. WHEN ACR X DEVIATED HIS CLRNC; HE DID NOT NOTIFY ME OF SUCH AND THE FARS REQUIRE HIM TO DO SO. FURTHERMORE; I KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THE CPR JET AT 15000 FT IN THE ADJACENT SECTOR. WHILE I PLAYED A ROLE IN THIS SIT; THERE WERE MANY CAUSAL FACTORS. MY MISSED READBACK WOULD NOT HAVE CAUSED AN ERROR; BUT THE DEV SURE DID. IN MY OPINION; THE PLT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TURNED IN FOR A DEV -- CAUSING AN ERROR.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.