AFTER LNDG RWY 08 AT ABQ; PLT OF BE90 FAILS TO 'HOLD SHORT OF RWY 03' AT TXWY E AS CLRED. ADVISES RWY SIGN AT THAT POINT INDICATES RWY 21 ONLY AND NOT THE RECIPROCAL; I.E. RWY 03.

Narrative

AFTER LNDG ON RWY 8 AT ABQ WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO EXIT AT E6 FOR OUR TAXI BACK FOR DEP ON RWY 8. AFTER CONTACTING GND ON 121.9 WE WERE TOLD 'TXWY E HOLD SHORT RWY 3.' THE PNF WAS OPERATING THE RADIO AND DID NOT CONFIRM WITH PF THE HOLD SHORT INSTRUCTIONS. PNF HAD HIS HEAD INSIDE. PF TAXIED W ON TXWY E AND WHEN THE ACFT GOT TO THE HOLD LINE FOR RWY 21 QUERIED THE PNF AS TO THE HOLD SHORT INSTRUCTIONS; PNF STATED WE ARE TO HOLD SHORT OF RWY 3. THE RWY SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OF TXWY E AND THE HOLD SHORT LINE DOES NOT INDICATE RWY 3-21; IT ONLY HAS '21' ON THE SIGN. WHEN GIVEN A HOLD SHORT OF RWY 3 WE WERE LOOKING FOR A RWY SIGN THAT HAS A 3 ON IT. THERE IS NO RWY 3 SIGN ANYWHERE ON TXWY E! I TAXIED PAST THE HOLD SHORT LINES AND THEN REALIZED THAT THE RECIPROCAL OF 21 IS 3. IF THE RWY SIGNAGE WOULD HAVE SAID 3-21 I WOULD HAVE HELD SHORT. IF THE GND CTLR WOULD HAVE STATED HOLD SHORT OF 21 I WOULD HAVE HELD SHORT. THE GND CTLR SHOULD HAVE STATED HOLD SHORT OF RWY 3-21 OR RWY 21 BECAUSE RWY 21 IS THE ONLY RWY MARKED ON THE SIGN. I HAVE NO EXCUSE FOR THE INCIDENT. I CALLED THE SUPVR AND TALKED TO HIM ABOUT THE PROB; HE SAID THAT THE CTLR SHOULD HAVE GIVEN THE HOLD SHORT AND STATED RWY 21 NOT RWY 3. GND CTL WAS AWARE OF THE SIGNAGE PROB AS THEY STATED THEY HAVE HAD NUMEROUS OCCURRENCES. THE SUPVR STATED HE HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CTLRS NOT TO USE HOLD SHORT OF RWY 3 BECAUSE THERE IS NO RWY 3 SIGN BUT TO USE HOLD SHORT OF RWY 21. RWY 3 AND RWY 8 WERE THE ACTIVE RWYS THAT DAY; ATIS ONLY STATED RWY 8 WAS THE ACTIVE. IN THIS CASE THERE WAS NO INCURSION OR LOSS OF SEPARATION. THE TWR CTLR HAD JUST ISSUED THE CLRNC TO GND TO ALLOW ME TO CROSS WHEN I TAXIED ACROSS. THANK GOODNESS THIS WAS CONSIDERED A NON-OCCURRENCE. THERE WAS NO PLT DEVIATION OR CTLR DEVIATION FILED. THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY NEEDS TO FIX THE LACK OF MARKINGS ON THE SIGN AND FIX THE HOLD SHORT LINE AS IT IS OBLITERATED AND HARD TO SEE WHEN IT IS COMBINED WITH TXWY HOTEL AND LOOKING DIRECTLY INTO THE SETTING SUN. THIS OCCURRENCE WAS A COMBINATION OF SEVERAL BREAKDOWNS IN GOOD PROC FROM THE PLTS RIGHT ON UP THRU THE CTLRS AND ARPT MGMNT. EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS INCIDENT EXCEPT THE PLTS WERE WELL AWARE OF THE SIGN AND MISIDENTIFICATION OF THE RWY PROB. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR COMMENTED THAT WHILE THE ATC REPRESENTATIVE TO WHOM HE TALKED WAS SYMPATHETIC TO THE SIT AND ADVISED THAT THIS IS A RECURRING PROB; THERE IS NO INTENTION AT THIS TIME TO SPEND MONEY ON REPLACING THE SIGN WITH A PROPERLY DESCRIPTIVE ONE. ATCT GND CTLRS HAVE BEEN ASKED TO REFER TO RWY 21 VICE RWY 03 FOR SUCH CROSSING RESTRS BUT; WHEN RWY 03 IS AN ACTIVE RWY THEY ARE INCLINED TO USE THE RWY 03 DESCRIPTOR FOR ALL COMMENTS RELATIVE TO THE RWY. HE FURTHER STRESSED THAT THE ATIS SAID NOTHING ABOUT RWY 03 BEING AN 'ACTIVE' RWY. HE LEARNED THIS ONLY AS A RESULT OF SUBSEQUENT CONVERSATIONS WITH THE TOWER.