A B767 HAD A LONGERON WEB AT STRINGER 12R REPAIRED. REPAIR APPROVED BY FAA; BUT WAS TIME LIMITED TO 12 MONTHS. RPTR CONTACTS ALL MAINT MGRS TO ALERT THAT TIME IS RUNNING OUT AND ACFT MUST BE REPAIRED.
Synopsis
A B767 HAD A LONGERON WEB AT STRINGER 12R REPAIRED. REPAIR APPROVED BY FAA; BUT WAS TIME LIMITED TO 12 MONTHS. RPTR CONTACTS ALL MAINT MGRS TO ALERT THAT TIME IS RUNNING OUT AND ACFT MUST BE REPAIRED.
Narrative
UPPER LONGERON WEB AT BS 1809-5 AT STRINGER 12-R ACFT X WAS REPAIRED DURING MAINT BASE VISIT. THE REPAIR WAS APPROVED ON FAA FORM DATED FEB/WED/05 AS '...STRUCTURALLY ACCEPTABLE AS A TIME-LIMITED FOR 12 MONTHS.' COMPLIANCE TO FAR 25.571 HAS NOT BEEN EVALUATED. THE COMPLIANCE FINDING FOR FAR 25.571 IS DEFERRED FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 12 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THIS FORM; PENDING COMPLETION OF THE FATIGUE AND TOLERANCE ANALYSIS. THE AIRPLANE BECOMES UNAIRWORTHY 12 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THIS FORM; UNLESS A NEW FAA FORM IS ISSUED PRIOR TO THAT TIME FINDING COMPLIANCE TO FAR 25.571. A TIME EXTENSION FOR INTERIM REPAIR DISPOSITION WAS NOT FILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GPM. A GPM AUDIT OF THE BILL OF WORK WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY ME; AT WHICH TIME I IDENTED THE FACT THAT THE DEFERRED MAINT/INTERIM REPAIR PROVISIONS OF GPM HAD NOT BEEN ACCOMPLISHED IN THAT THERE WAS NO RECORD OF THE INTERIM REPAIR IN THE ACFT LOG AND THE WRITE-UP DID NOT HAVE THE APPROPRIATE INFO ENTERED. THE AUDIT FINDING WAS FORWARDED TO B767 MGR WITH A COPY OF THE AUDIT TO QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPVR. ON APR/MON/05 RESPONSE DATE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS ESTABLISHED. ON APR/FRI/05 I RECEIVED A COPY OF AN E-MAIL FROM B767 SUPVR TO QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPVR REQUESTING AN AUDIT RESPONSE DATE EXTENSION AND STATING THAT ENGINEERING WAS TRACKING THE MAINT REVIEW RPT. I AM UNAWARE OF THE RESPONSE TO THAT E-MAIL. ON JUN/THU/05 HAVING HAD NO RESPONSE OR COM FROM ANYONE WITH RESPECT TO THIS ISSUE; I WROTE AN E-MAIL DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING MGR WITH COPIES TO PRODUCTION SUPVR; QUALITY ASSURANCE; AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPVR; STATING MY CONCERNS AND REQUESTING THAT THE ISSUE BE ADDRESSED. ON JUL/THU/05 HAVING HEARD NO RESPONSE FROM ANY OF THE INDIVIDUALS I CONTACTED ON JUN/THU/05; I FORWARDED AN E-MAIL TO QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPVR ADVISING HIM THAT THE MATTER REMAINED OPEN AND THAT THE MATTER WAS REFERRED TO HIM FOR DISPOSITION. BTWN THE DATES OF SEP/MON/05 AND OCT/THU/05; I DISCUSSED THE MATTER FURTHER WITH QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPVR WHO ADVISED ME TO CONTACT ENGINEERING IN ORDER TO GET THE MATTER RESOLVED. I CONTACTED AND FORWARDED HIM THE INFO. A FOLLOW-UP CONVERSATION SEVERAL DAYS LATER CONFIRMED THAT THE SITUATION HAD NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. ON OCT/THU/05; I DISCUSSED THE MATTER WITH QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPVR AND NOTIFIED HIM OF MY INTENT TO FILE A RPT. HE AGREED THAT THE COURSE OF ACTION WAS THE ONLY ONE REMAINING AND THAT I SHOULD DO SO.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.