AN H269 INSTRUCTOR PLT AND STUDENT EXPERIENCED A PWR LOSS AND RETURNED TO A TXWY PARALLEL TO THE ARPT'S ACTIVE RWY.

Date: 2005-11 · Aircraft: Model 269A/300/Osage · Phase: takeoff

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-less-severe|deviation-altitude-excursion-from-assigned-altitude|deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far|inflight-event-encounter-unstabilized-approach

Synopsis

AN H269 INSTRUCTOR PLT AND STUDENT EXPERIENCED A PWR LOSS AND RETURNED TO A TXWY PARALLEL TO THE ARPT'S ACTIVE RWY.

Narrative

SHORTLY AFTER TKOF (STUDENT AT THE CTLS); WHILE OVER TREES (APPROX 50 FT TALL); WE EXPERIENCED A TORQUE KICK AND PARTIAL LOSS OF PWR. I IMMEDIATELY TOOK THE CTLS. WE LOST ABOUT 25-50 FT OF ALT. OUR NORMAL DEP PATH WHEN ON A RWY 36 CONFIGN IS TO THE W OVER THE TREES. AS I HAD ALREADY LOST SOME ALT; I MADE THE DECISION TO TURN R TOWARD THE ACTIVE RWY. I MADE 2 CALLS TO TWR WITH NO RESPONSE. AT THAT TIME I LOOKED TO THE R; DOWN THE ACTIVE RWY AND NOT SEEING ANY TFC ELECTED TO CONTINUE TOWARD THE PARALLEL TXWY ON THE E SIDE OF THE ACTIVE RWY. AS I APCHED THE ACTIVE RWY; TWR CALLED AND ASKED MY INTENTIONS. I TOLD TWR I HAD AN ENG PROB AND WANTED TO LAND ON THE TXWY. AT THIS TIME TWR INFORMED ME OF THE LEARJET ON LNDG ROLLOUT AND TOLD ME TO CONTINUE TO THE TXWY. IN HINDSIGHT; I SHOULD HAVE REMAINED W OF THE ACTIVE UNTIL IN DEFINITE CONTACT WITH THE TWR. AT THE TIME I FELT I HAD THE CHOICE BTWN A STEEP APCH TO THE GRASS WITH AN UNSURE ENG OR A MORE NORMAL APCH TO THE TXWY ACROSS THE ACTIVE. THE SAFEST THING; HOWEVER; WOULD HAVE BEEN TO REMAIN ON THE W SIDE AND ACCEPT A LNDG ON THE GRASS. I'M NOT SURE IF THERE IS A TRAINING ASPECT THAT WOULD HAVE MADE THIS ANY BETTER. IT WAS JUST NOT A VERY GOOD DECISION ON MY PART; BUT AT THE TIME IT SEEMED LIKE THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.