A B737-400 CAPT RPTS CONCERN ABOUT MAINT REQUESTING TROUBLESHOOTING OF #1 ENG VIBRATION SYS AT START OF APCH.

Date: 2006-07 · Aircraft: B737-400 · Phase: approach

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-maintenance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far

Synopsis

A B737-400 CAPT RPTS CONCERN ABOUT MAINT REQUESTING TROUBLESHOOTING OF #1 ENG VIBRATION SYS AT START OF APCH.

Narrative

ENG #1 VIBRATION INDICATOR WAS SHOWING 2.5 UNITS OF VIBRATION; ALL OTHER ENG PARAMETERS WERE NORMAL. NO ACFT VIBRATION WAS NOTED. WE CALLED MAINT TO LET THEM KNOW THAT WE HAD PUT THE INFO IN THE ACFT LOGBOOK. WE WERE HOLDING AT 11000 FT AWAITING RELEASE TO START THE APCH. MAINT WANTED US TO 'TROUBLESHOOT' THE PROB. IT APPEARED THAT IT WAS ONLY AN INDICATION PROB AND NOT AN ACTUAL ENG VIBRATION. LINE MAINT WANTED US TO TURN OFF THE ENG HYD PUMP FOR ENG #1 AND TURN THE ASSOCIATED PACK OFF. WE DID NOT ELECT TO GIVE OURSELVES AN EMER FOR AN INDICATION PROB; SO WE DID NOT FOLLOW MAINT REQUEST. ALSO WE WERE ABOUT TO DSND BELOW 10000 FT. THERE IS NO PROC IN THE FLT HANDBOOK OR QRH FOR WHAT THEY WANTED US TO DO. THE VIBRATION INDICATION WAS WELL WITHIN LIMITS AS STATED IN THE QRH. WE ARE NOT MAINT TEST PLTS AND THIS WAS A PART 121 FLT. I THINK THERE IS A DISCONNECT BTWN MAINT AND THE PLTS ABOUT WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT DO. MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS THAT A JUNIOR CREW MIGHT ACTUALLY FOLLOW MAINT REQUEST.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.