A B767-300 ON ROKIL ARR TO EDDM DEVIATED FROM THE CHARTED TRACK WHEN A COMMERCIAL CHART 2 CHART NOTE WAS MISINTERPRETED.

Narrative

REF NAV CHART MUNICH; GERMANY ROKIL 26 RNAV TRANSITION: DURING ARR UPON REACHING POINT DM429; WE STARTED OUR TURN TO BASE; HOWEVER; THE CTLR INTERRUPTED OUR TURN BY ASSIGNING US A 080 DEG HDG; AND SHORTLY THEREAFTER TURNING US TO BASE AND THEN FINAL (NO SEPARATION LOST). HE THEN EXPLAINED THAT THAT THE FOOTNOTE ON THE PAGE SHOULD BE INTERPRETED AS 'DO NOT INITIATE TURN TO BASE UNLESS CLRED BY ATC' VERSUS WHAT IT ACTUALLY SAYS 'NO TURN ONTO FINAL...' ON OUR ARR SETUP/BRIEFING THIS NOTE WAS READ; HOWEVER IT WAS INTERPED AS IT READ: 'NO TURN TO FINAL...' FURTHERMORE; THE TRACK DEPICTION ON CHART SHOWS A DISTINCT BASE AND DISTINCT FINAL. ADDITIONALLY; IF NO TURN IS ALLOWED AT DM429 WITHOUT ATC CLRNC; IT SHOULD BE DEPICTED AND LOADED ACCORDINGLY (IT IS NOT). REF SIMILAR ARRS INTO CDG AND AMS THAT DEPICT THIS EXPLICITLY TO CONTINUE ON PRESENT TRACK OR HDG UNTIL ATC GIVES FURTHER CLRNC. FINALLY; IT APPEARED THAT CTLR TRAINING WAS IN PROGRESS. ON PREVIOUS ARRS; CTLRS HAD GIVEN VECTORS LONG BEFORE DM429; AND THIS CTLR WAS OVERRIDDEN MULTIPLE TIMES BY ANOTHER CTLR THROUGHOUT OUR TIME ON THE FREQ.