FO OF C560 RPTS ATCT PERSONNEL AT ORF ARE NOT AUGMENTING ASOS AUTOMATED RPTS AS REQUIRED.
Synopsis
FO OF C560 RPTS ATCT PERSONNEL AT ORF ARE NOT AUGMENTING ASOS AUTOMATED RPTS AS REQUIRED.
Narrative
PRIOR TO ARR; ORF ATIS WAS RPTING MVFR CONDITIONS WITH 4 MI VISIBILITY IN MIST (BR) WITH MOSTLY CLR SKIES. AFTER TOUCHDOWN WE OBSERVED THICK GND FOG (MIFG) COVERING PART OF THE ARPT. THE TXWY WE PLANNED TO EXIT RWY 5 WITH WAS COVERED WITH FOG AND WE USED A DIFFERENT TXWY THAT WAS MORE VISIBLE. DURING OUR STAY THAT EVENING AT ORF; THE METAR/SPECI RPTS WERE TOTALLY INACCURATE. IT APPEARED ORF ATCT (WHICH SUPPOSEDLY AUGMENTS THE ASOS) WAS NOT PROPERLY AUGMENTING ASOS. THERE WAS NOTHING ON ATIS OR IN THE METAR/SPECI; WHICH INDICATED DENSE SHALLOW FOG. THE METAR'S/SPECI'S WOULD GO FROM VFR TO LIFR MINUTE BY MINUTE AS FOG MOVED ACROSS THE ASOS SENSORS. AT TIMES; THE ATIS WOULD HAVE AN OBSERVATION THAT WAS DIFFERENT THAN THE LONG-LINE DISSEMINATED METAR OR SPECI. FOR EXAMPLE; THE ASOS METAR HAD A 1 1/2 MI VISIBILITY AT ONE POINT WHILE THE ATIS HAD A 10 MI VISIBILITY IN MIST (NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAA ORDER 7900.5B). THE 'AUGMENTATION' AT SVC LEVEL C SITES (LAWRS/ATCT) IS INADEQUATE. CTLRS FREQUENTLY DO NOT AUGMENT ASOS PROPERLY AND ALLOW INACCURATE AND/OR INCOMPLETE WX OBSERVATIONS TO BE DISSEMINATED TO PLTS. THIS CAN CAUSE DANGEROUS SITS. I'VE NOTICED AT OTHER ARPTS THAT SOMETIMES CTLRS AREN'T EVEN LOGGED INTO ASOS AND LET METAR/SPECI OBSERVATIONS REMAIN IN 'AUTO' MODE EVEN WHEN THE ATCT IS OPEN.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.