B767-400ER FLT CREW MISIDENTS RWY OF INTENDED LNDG AT MCO. TWR RECOGNIZES THE ERROR AND RECLRS THEM TO LAND ON RWY TO WHICH THEY WERE ALIGNED.

Date: 2006-12 · Aircraft: B767-400 and 400 ER · Phase: approach

Anomalies: conflict-airborne-conflict|deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance

Synopsis

B767-400ER FLT CREW MISIDENTS RWY OF INTENDED LNDG AT MCO. TWR RECOGNIZES THE ERROR AND RECLRS THEM TO LAND ON RWY TO WHICH THEY WERE ALIGNED.

Narrative

ON VECTOR TO FAF RWY 35R AT MCO WE SIGHTED ARPT AND WERE CLRED VISUAL APCH TO RWY 35R WITH ANOTHER ACFT IN SIGHT XING OUR PATH TO THE INSIDE RWY. I SOMETIMES HAVE TROUBLE AT MCO ON VISUAL APCHS SINCE RWYS 17L; 35R IS WAY E OF THE TERMINAL AREA. FOR THAT REASON AFTER I THINK I'VE IDENTED RWY I REFER TO THE FMC LINEUP AND ILS INFO TO CONFIRM MY POS. ANYWAY AFTER A FEW SECONDS TWR OFFERED US RWY 35L AND I ACCEPTED. I LOOKED AT THE OTHER ACFT (I THOUGHT WAS GOING THERE) AND THE FMS TO SEE WERE DISPLACED TO THE L OF THE FMC LINE. I ROLLED OUT AND ASKED THE FO TO ENTER THE NEW RWY. ABOUT THIS TIME I WAS THINKING OUR COMPANY'S MINIMUM REQUIREMENT FOR A VISUAL IS BOTH PLTS POSITIVELY IDENTING THE RWY. I FIGURED I WAS LINING UP ON THE L W SIDE AND STARTED A CORRECTION. APPARENTLY THE OTHER ACFT WAS GOING TO THE W SIDE (NOT THE INSIDE) AND THE FO HAD ALREADY INPUT THE FMS CHANGE. NOW TWR RECLRED ME TO RWY 35R AND I LANDED UNEVENTFULLY. AS FAR AS I KNOW; NO CONFLICT; NO BIG DEAL; BUT IT COULD HAVE BEEN. LESSONS? 17000+ HRS AND IT'S STILL A GOOD IDEA TO USE ALL AVAILABLE INFO AND FOLLOW COMPANY POLICIES!

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.