ACR FIRST OFFICER LAMENTS THE LACK OF TRAINING OFFERED TO CAPTAINS OPERATING INTO HIGH ALTITUDE AND TERRAIN RESTRICTED ARPTS.
Synopsis
ACR FIRST OFFICER LAMENTS THE LACK OF TRAINING OFFERED TO CAPTAINS OPERATING INTO HIGH ALTITUDE AND TERRAIN RESTRICTED ARPTS.
Narrative
I HAVE BEEN CONCERNED WITH CHK AIRMEN NOT BEING PUT ON FLTS INTO SEQU; SLLP; MHTG; ETC. I HAVE WRITTEN 2 TIMES ABOUT WHAT I SAW IN SEQU ONCE ABOUT SLLP AND ONCE ABOUT MMMX. THE MOST RECENT RESPONSE WENT SOMETHING LIKE 'IF THE CAPT WANTED A CHK AIRMAN ALL HE HAD TO DO WAS ASK.' LET ME RELAY TO YOU THE BASIC CONTENT OF A CONVERION I HAD WITH ONE OF THOSE CAPTS ON ONE OF THOSE FLTS I WROTE A RPT ON. HE BASICALLY SAID; I KNOW I COULD HAVE ASKED FOR A CHK AIRMAN; BUT I REHEARSED IN MY MIND WHAT OUR CHIEF WOULD SAY; NAMELY: 'YOU ARE QUALIFIED; YOU ARE THE LAST GUY WE HAVE GOT; YOU'VE BEEN ON THE AIRPLANE FOR YRS AND YRS; YOU CAN HANDLE IT! YOU AREN'T TELLING ME THAT YOU CAN'T COMPLETE THE MISSION; ARE YOU?' THE FEELING I PICKED UP FROM HIS COMMENTS WERE THAT HE WAS AVOIDING A FEELING OF SHAME. I WILL SAY THAT I'VE HEARD SIMILAR COMMENTS FROM OTHERS. I WILL ALSO SAY THAT THE EVENT IN WHICH WE FOUND OURSELVES IN WAS POSSIBLY THE WORST SIT I'VE SEEN IN OVER 16 YRS. MAYBE IT IS JUST PERCEPTION; MAYBE THE 'CHIEFS' ARE NOT INTENDING TO 'PLT PUSH.' IT IS; HOWEVER; THE PERCEPTION THAT COUNTS AND IT IS THAT CAPT'S PERCEPTION THAT CONTRIBUTED TO OUR 'EVENT.' WHO CAN FIX THAT PERCEPTION? IN DECEMBER I HAD AN FAA GUY IN THE COCKPIT FOR A FLT. HIS WORDS REGARDING A DIFFERENT ISSUE BUT STILL A SAFETY ONE WERE 'THIS IS A UNION/COMPANY DEAL.' SO I ALSO HASTEN TO SAY; MY INTENT IS NOT ANY UNION/COMPANY DEAL. I ALSO WILL SAY THAT I HOPE THAT ATTITUDE; WHICH I BELIEVE TO BE A MISTAKEN ONE; IS NOT THE PREDOMINANT ONE AT THE FAA. WHAT I HAVE SEEN IN SEQU; SLLP AND ELSEWHERE IS UNSAFE AND THE DIRECTION THAT OUR COMPANY IS TAKING IS; IN MY OPINION; IS THE WRONG ONE. MAYBE I'M JUST THE UNLUCKY GUY. MAYBE I'M THE 'COMMON DENOMINATOR' (ALL THESE EVENTS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED HAD I NOT CLOWNED SOMETHING UP). I AM SIMPLY COMMUNICATING WHAT I HAVE SEEN AND MY BELIEF THAT PUTTING A CHK AIRMAN BACK ON THE TERRAIN CITIES FOR BOTH CAPTS AND FO'S IS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A SAFE OP. ON 3 DIFFERENT RECENT OCCASIONS I HAVE NEEDED TO 'DIRECT OR INSTRUCT' A CAPT ON HOW TO PREVENT AN UNSAFE SIT OR HOW TO GET OUT OF ONE. I'M NO BETTER A PLT THAN THE NEXT GUY; BUT I HAVE HAD THE GOOD FORTUNE OF BOTH GETTING A CHK RIDE INTO EACH OF THOSE CITIES AND 8 YRS EXPERIENCE FLYING INTO LATIN AMERICA. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU PAIR A NEW CAPT WITH A FO WHO HAS NEVER BEEN TO SEQU OR SOME OTHER TERRAIN CITY? I AM ALL FOR SAVING MONEY; JUST NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF SAFETY.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.