A319 CAPTAIN DETAILS HIS REFUSAL TO DEPART WITH THREE DIFFERENT ACFT FOR MAINTENANCE DISCREPANCIES. ALSO NOTES PRESSURE FROM MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR NOT TO DO SO.
Synopsis
A319 CAPTAIN DETAILS HIS REFUSAL TO DEPART WITH THREE DIFFERENT ACFT FOR MAINTENANCE DISCREPANCIES. ALSO NOTES PRESSURE FROM MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR NOT TO DO SO.
Narrative
AFTER GETTING TKOF CLRNC WE TAXIED INTO POS AND STARTED OUR TKOF ROLL. WE GOT A PACK OVERHEAT WARNING AND ABORTED OUR TKOF. WE TAXIED OFF THE RWY AND IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING IN TOUCH WITH OUR DISPATCHER AND MAINT; THE ELAC 1 CAME ON. AFTER TALKING WITH DISPATCH AND MAINT; WE ALL AGREED THAT THE ACFT WOULD BE TAKEN OTS SINCE THESE WERE RECURRING ISSUES AND IT WAS NOT REASONABLE TO TAKE THIS AIRPLANE TO A NON-MAINT ARPT. WE RETURNED TO THE GATE. AFTER DEPLANING WE WENT TO OUR NEW GATE. BEFORE WE HAD A CHANCE TO EVEN GET ON THE AIRPLANE; A MAINT SUPVR APCHED ME AND ASKED IF I HAD OFFICIALLY DECLINED THE AIRPLANE. HE WAS A LITTLE RUDE AND CONFRONTATIONAL. I ASKED HIM WHO HE WAS AND THEN SHOWED HIM THE ACARS WITH THE DECLINE. HE TOLD ME THAT I DID NOT DECLINE THE AIRPLANE; SO I PROCEEDED TO CALL DISPATCH. UPON DOING THAT I REALIZED THAT THE SUPVR WAS NOT TALKING ABOUT THE PREVIOUS AIRPLANE BUT THE CURRENT ONE WHICH HAD AN ISSUE I WAS NOT AWARE OF. EVIDENTLY; THE AIRPLANE HAD A BRAKE PROB. AFTER TALKING WITH THE DISPATCHER; IT WAS DECIDED THAT IT WAS NOT SAFE TO TAKE THIS AIRPLANE SINCE WE WERE GOING TO AN ARPT WITH A SHORT RWY. I INFORMED THE MAINT SUPVR OF THE CURRENT SITUATION AND AGAIN WAS ASKED TO OFFICIALLY DECLINE THE AIRPLANE AND HE ALSO ADVISED ME THAT I WAS NOT FOLLOWING OFFICIAL PROC. AS FAR AS I WAS CONCERNED I WAS DOING EVERYTHING BY THE BOOK. AFTER MAINT DEACTIVATED THE GAUGE; THE MAINT SUPVR ONCE AGAIN CAME OVER TO ME IN AN AGITATED MANNER AND ASKED THAT WHY; AFTER THE GAUGE WAS DEACTIVATED; WOULD I STILL NOT TAKE THE AIRPLANE. HE TOLD ME THAT BY DECLINING THE AIRPLANE I WAS INCONVENIENCING ALL THESE PAX WHO WERE ALREADY LATE AND NOT TO FORGET THAT THEIR BUSINESS PAYS OUR SALARIES. I INFORMED HIM THAT I WAS NOT TRYING TO INCONVENIENCE ANYONE; BUT THAT INSTEAD I WAS TURNING DOWN THE ACFT BECAUSE IT WAS NOT SAFE AND THAT I WAS FIRST AND FOREMOST CONCERNED WITH SAFETY. AFTER THIS FRUSTRATING CONVERSATION; I CALLED THE ZZZ CHIEF PLT AND DISCUSSED THE SITUATION AT HAND. HE AGREED WITH MY ACTIONS AND DECISIONS AND THOUGHT I WAS HANDLING THE SITUATION CORRECTLY. I WAS ALSO CONTACTED BY THE DUTY FLT MGR SO HE COULD GET UP TO DATE ON THE SITUATION; EVIDENTLY HE WAS INFORMED OF IT SOMEHOW; AND HE WAS ALSO SUPPORTIVE. UPON THE SECOND DECLINE; I WAS GIVEN A THIRD AIRPLANE THAT WAS COMING IN FROM THE HANGAR. THIS AIRPLANE HAD AN ENG REPLACED. I STARTED TO DO THE WALKAROUND AND NOTICED A LARGE AMOUNT OF HYD FLUID UNDERNEATH ENG #1. THERE WAS SO MUCH FLUID THAT I; FOR A SECOND; THOUGHT THAT IT COULDN'T HAVE COME FROM THIS AIRPLANE. I THEN GET ON THE PHONE AND FIND OUT THAT THE AIRPLANE HAS A HYD LEAK FROM THE GREEN LINE WHEN THE ENGS ARE STARTED UP. THIS AIRPLANE HAD A MAINT ISSUE AND MAINT TOOK IT OUT OF SVC. TODAY; I ENCOUNTERED 3 AIRPLANES THAT ALL HAD SOME KIND OF MAINT ISSUE. I; IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY; COULD NOT TAKE ANY OF THESE AIRPLANES.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.