A LARGE TRANSPORT ACFT TWO ENG FREIGHTER PILOT REPORTS HIS CONCERNS ABOUT MAINT OPENING THE MAIN CARGO DOOR IN WIND CONDITIONS THAT EXCEED THE MAX LIMITATION OF THEIR OPERATIONS MANUAL.

Date: 2008-02 · Aircraft: Medium Large Transport · Phase: ground

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-maintenance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

A LARGE TRANSPORT ACFT TWO ENG FREIGHTER PILOT REPORTS HIS CONCERNS ABOUT MAINT OPENING THE MAIN CARGO DOOR IN WIND CONDITIONS THAT EXCEED THE MAX LIMITATION OF THEIR OPERATIONS MANUAL.

Narrative

THE WINDS WERE RPTED AS BEING 310 DEGS AT 35 KTS; GUSTING TO 45 KTS. TO OPERATE THE MAIN CARGO DOOR; THE MAX WINDS ARE MENTIONED AS 40 KTS IN THE LIMITATION SECTION OF THE AOM. SO I WAS NOT ABOUT TO OPEN THE DOOR AND EXCEED THE DOOR LIMITATIONS. A MECH CAME UP AND AGAINST MY BETTER JUDGEMENT OPENED THE CARGO DOOR ANYWAY. I SUBSEQUENTLY ASKED HIM TO MAKE A NOTATION IN THE ACFT LOGBOOK TO THAT EFFECT; WHICH HE DID. IN THE CORRECTIVE ACTION SECTION HE WROTE THAT THE WINDS WERE DIRECTLY ON THE TAIL OF THE CRAFT AND THAT THEY WERE 44 KTS. I ASKED FOR PROOF (ON PAPER) THAT THIS WAS WITHIN THE LIMITS THAT MAINT HAS IN THEIR MANUALS. WHEN HE SHOWED ME THEIR MANUAL; IT SAID THAT WINDS UP TO 50 KTS WERE ALLOWED; BUT THE ACFT 'MUST' BE TURNED WITH THE NOSE INTO THE WIND. THIS WAS DIRECTLY CONTRADICTORY TO THE ACTUAL SITUATION AND SO I BELIEVE THE LIMITS ON THE DOOR WERE EXCEEDED. I FELT PRESSURED INTO FLYING AN AIRPLANE OF WHICH THE LIMITS WERE KNOWINGLY EXCEEDED. MGMNT CONVINCED ME OF THE FACT THAT ALL I NEED TO CHK AS PIC; IS THAT THERE ARE NO OPEN WRITE-UPS AND THAT A MECH HAS SIGNED THE ACFT AS AIRWORTHY ON THE DISPATCH LOG.

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.