ATTEMPTING TO EXPEDITE THEIR ARRIVAL; FLT CREW OF B737-300 CALLS RWY IN SIGHT FOR VISUAL APCH WITHOUT ACTUALLY SEEING IT. STRONG TAILWINDS; LACK OF RAW DATA AND DEPENDENCE ON AUTOMATION RESULT IN DISORIENTATION AND THE NEED TO GAR AND LAND ON ACTIVE RWY.

Date: 2008-04 · Aircraft: B737-300 · Phase: approach

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|inflight-event-encounter-unstabilized-approach|inflight-event-encounter-weather-turbulence

Synopsis

ATTEMPTING TO EXPEDITE THEIR ARRIVAL; FLT CREW OF B737-300 CALLS RWY IN SIGHT FOR VISUAL APCH WITHOUT ACTUALLY SEEING IT. STRONG TAILWINDS; LACK OF RAW DATA AND DEPENDENCE ON AUTOMATION RESULT IN DISORIENTATION AND THE NEED TO GAR AND LAND ON ACTIVE RWY.

Narrative

MADE DECISION TO LAND ON RWY 4L IN ZZZ; OPPOSITE DIRECTION TO EXPEDITE ARR TO ARPT. WINDS WERE WITHIN LIMITS AT TOUCHDOWN; BUT 230 DEGS AT 45 KTS AT 2000 FT AGL. APPROX 20 NM FROM THE FIELD; I THOUGHT I HAD THE RWY IN SIGHT; BUT PLANNED TO VERIFY WITH A COMBINATION OF LNAV AND THE LOC. AT APPROX 10 NM FROM RWY 4L I STARTED TO CONFIGURE THE ACFT AT 2000 FT. THE ACFT STARTED A L TURN IN LNAV BEFORE I EXPECTED IT TO AND THE FMC THEN DISPLAYED UNABLE RNP (I BELIEVE THIS WAS DUE TO THE STRONG WINDS). I THEN WENT TO VOR/LOC EXPECTING TO GET THE LOC; BUT TWR HAD NOT TURNED THE LOC AROUND AS THE ACTIVE RWY WAS RWY 22R. TWR THEN ASKED IF WE HAD THE RWY IN SIGHT. WHEN WE DIDN'T RESPOND; HE DIRECTED THAT WE CLB TO 2000 FT AND FLY HDG 040 DEGS. TWR THEN POINTED OUT THE RWY AT 3 O'CLOCK LOW AND WE RECONFIGURED THE ACFT ON DOWNWIND AFTER THE GAR AND LANDED ON RWY 22R. I DIDN'T COMMUNICATE VERY WELL WITH THE FO DUE TO WORKLOAD AND HE ASSUMED THAT I SAW THE RWY. ALSO; I SHOULDN'T HAVE CALLED THE FIELD IN SIGHT UNTIL I WAS ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN THAT I SAW THE RWY AND SHOULD HAVE 'FESSED UP' EARLIER THAT I DIDN'T HAVE IT; BUT WAS DISTR DUE TO WORKLOAD. DUE TO OUR ARR ANGLE; IT WAS DIFFICULT TO IDENT THE RWY ENVIRONMENT AS THERE WERE NO APCH LIGHTS ON FOR RWY 4L. ALTHOUGH WE COMMUNICATED OUR INTENTIONS EARLY TO ATC; WE SHOULD HAVE COORDINATED FOR THE LOC AND/OR RWY LIGHTING FOR THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION RWY. FINALLY; GIVEN THE WINDS AT 2000 FT AGL; AN EARLIER DECISION TO GO TO RWY 22R WOULD HAVE BEEN PRUDENT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 784860: LESSON LEARNED: DON'T CALL THE FIELD IN SIGHT UNLESS BOTH PLTS ACTUALLY HAVE IT IN SIGHT. ALSO; DON'T RELY ON AUTOMATION ALL OF THE TIME LIKE WE TEND TO DO. WE THOUGHT THE LOC WAS OPERATING FOR RWY 4L; BUT WE CAME TO FIND OUT FROM TWR THAT IT WAS NOT RUNNING BECAUSE WE WERE ON A VISUAL APCH.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.