EA50 PILOT DECLARES MIN FUEL AFTER WX DIVERSION AND APPROACH DELAYS.
Synopsis
EA50 PILOT DECLARES MIN FUEL AFTER WX DIVERSION AND APPROACH DELAYS.
Narrative
THE WX AT ZZZ DETERIORATED TO THE POINT WHERE A DEV WAS NECESSARY. SINCE AN ARPT WITH CUSTOMS WAS REQUIRED; I CHOSE ZZZ1. I HAD PLENTY OF FUEL TO REACH ZZZ1; BUT BECAUSE I COULD NOT CLB VERY HIGH DUE TO ATC; MY FUEL BURN WAS HIGHER THAN EXPECTED. I MENTIONED TO ZZZ1 APCH THAT FUEL WAS A CONCERN AND I'D LIKE TO LAND ASAP. HE TOLD ME I WAS 12TH IN LINE FOR FINAL. I SAID THAT WILL NOT WORK FOR ME. HE SAID 'ARE YOU DECLARING AN EMER?' I SAID 'NO; BUT IF YOU FLY ME 1/2 WAY ACROSS THE LAKE; I'LL HAVE ONE.' HE OPENED A POS ABOUT 4 MI OUT ON FINAL; AND AT THAT POINT I DECIDED IT WAS TIME TO GET THE AIRPLANE ON THE GND. SO I DECLARED MINIMUM FUEL AND TOLD HIM I WANTED TO LAND NOW; I BELIEVE I COMPLIED WITH HIS REQUEST TO SAY THE WORD 'EMER;' TO EXPEDITE. HE TURNED ME INBOUND AND OVER TO TWR. TWR SAID; 'CLRED TO LAND AND THE TRUCKS ARE ROLLING.' I SUGGESTED THAT ROLLING THE TRUCKS WAS RIDICULOUS; AS THERE WAS NO EMER. HE SAID THAT JUST WHAT WE DO WHEN AN EMER IS DECLARED. I STILL THINK IT WAS A RIDICULOUS WASTE OF MANPOWER; AS THERE WAS NO ISSUE. AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG AND TAXI TO CUSTOMS ENSUED. I STILL HAD 250 LBS OF FUEL ON BOARD; BUT WE ECLIPSE PLTS LIKE TO BE ON THE GND WITH 300 LBS; FOR MORE SAFETY; EVEN THOUGH 250 LBS IS ADEQUATE. I MADE THE PROPER CALL; GIVEN HAD I FLOWN ANOTHER 10 MI; I WOULD HAVE BEEN IN DIRE CONSEQUENCES HAD I NEEDED TO GO AROUND FROM MY ORIGINAL APCH TO LNDG; NOT TO MENTION ONE 10-15 MINS LATER. THE TWR CONTENDS; PER FAA; AFTER I SPOKE WITH FAA; I SHOULD HAVE DECLARED MINIMUM FUEL MUCH SOONER. I SAY; GIVEN MIDDLE OF THE DAY; VFR; HOW WOULD ONE HAVE GUESSED THERE WOULD BE A 25 MI FINAL? NEXT TIME; I WOULD HAVE LANDED AT ANOTHER ARPT; FUELED THE AIRPLANE; AND DEALT WITH WHATEVER ISSUES CUSTOMS WOULD HAVE HAD WITH THAT DECISION. IN MY VIEW; FAR FEWER HEADACHES; AS ZZZ1 MADE A MOUNTAIN OUT OF A MOLEHILL. THE ZZZ1 FSDO WAS VERY HELPFUL AND CONCURRED WITH MY DECISION MAKING. THEY DID SUGGEST; HOWEVER; AN EARLIER DECLARATION OF MINIMUM FUEL WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE APPROPRIATE TO GIVE ATC MORE HEADS UP.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.