An air carrier pilot reported that Company policy required one pilot to display Terrain while the other pilot displayed Weather. If weather is present but terrain is flat; both pilots should be in weather for proper avoidance and discussion.
Synopsis
An air carrier pilot reported that Company policy required one pilot to display Terrain while the other pilot displayed Weather. If weather is present but terrain is flat; both pilots should be in weather for proper avoidance and discussion.
Narrative
A dark and stormy night. Autopilot engaged. Captain flying RNAV departure...electing to use Terrain display because I had selected weather. I could see thunderstorms in departure path - not rain - clear cut line of cells -and had to draw his attention to it because he was not displaying weather. At one point we nicked the edge of a cell; along with some real big bumps. We were way to close to the Big Red Blobs. In maneuvering to clear the weather; the Captain neglected to call for slat retraction. Since I was nervous about the 'weather avoidance' strategy and was closely monitoring the flight path. I did not complete the climb checklist; I became absorbed in the weather situation; and I did not notice slat extended. At 280 KTS 'slat overspeed' sounded. One day later I checked the maintenance record to see what the corrective action was needed and I could find no record of the slat overspeed logged in the maintenance computer; even though the Captain wrote it up. Looks like it just disappeared. Recommendation - If there is weather in the departure area both pilots should be required to display; brief; and avoid the weather. Having Terrain displayed is of no value over flat areas; and Terrain will 'pop up' if a conflict is detected anyway. We should both be looking at the real threat in any given situation; and these 50;000 FT Texas thunderstorms can be a real threat.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.