CTLR IN TRAINING USED WRONG NON RADAR PROC TO SEPARATE MDT DEP FROM ENROUTE OVERFLT AND HAD LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.
Synopsis
CTLR IN TRAINING USED WRONG NON RADAR PROC TO SEPARATE MDT DEP FROM ENROUTE OVERFLT AND HAD LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.
Narrative
MDT X DEPARTED CYS RWY 30 ON DIRECT ROUTE TO SHR. I WAS WORKING LCL CTL AND OBSERVED THE APCH CTLR AND THE FAC MGR; WHO WAS TRNING ON APCH; DISCUSS SEP PROCS TO BE USED BTWN MDT X AND SMT Y; WHO WAS OVERFLYING CYS. I BELIEVE SMT Y WAS ALSO ON A DIRECT ROUTE. THE 2 CTLRS DISCUSSED HOW THE 2 ACFT WOULD BE CONSIDERED ON THE SAME ROUTE AND THEN DISCUSSED UTILIZING THE 22 KT RULE. AS I WAS LISTENING TO THEM DISCUSS THIS RULE IT OCCURRED TO ME THAT THAT WOULD BE A LEVEL TRANSITION AND THAT YOU CANNOT USE THE 22 KT RULE WITH A DEP IN THE LEAD BECAUSE HE IS A CLBING ACFT AND THEREFORE NOT 22 KTS FASTER; AS MDT X WAS THE DEP. HOWEVER; SINCE I AM TRNING ON APCH; I FELT MAYBE I WAS WRONG AND SAID NOTHING. I HEARD THE APCH CTLR TRNEE (SUPVR) CLR MDT X TO CLB TO FL200 OR FL220 AFTER ASKING SMT Y 'SAY DME;' WHICH SMT Y RESPONDED. NEXT ZDV CALLED; SECTOR 22 AND APPARENTLY ADVISED THAT THERE WAS NOT ADEQUATE SEP. I OBSERVED TRNEE ISSUING TFC TO SMT Y IN THE MDT X AND THEN CALLING ZDV SECTOR 22 CTLR BACK AND SAYING THAT THE SMT Y HAD VISUAL SEP WITH THE MDT X. THERE WAS APPARENTLY ONLY 1/3 MI BTWN THE 2 ACFT WHEN MDT X CLBED THROUGH THE ALT OF SMT Y. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS SYS ERROR: WRONG UNDERSTANDING OF THE 22 KT RULE FROM THE 7110.65; WRONG INTERP OF VISUAL SEP--VISUAL SEP MUST HAVE ANOTHER SEP BEFORE AND AFTER APPLYING IT; APCH CTLR AND TRNEE (SUPVR) LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ON APCH CTL PROCS; APCH CTLR'S NOT VERIFYING THE POS OF SMT Y AND THE FPL CTLR TRNING THE SUPVR DID NOT STEP IN WHEN HE SHOULD HAVE TO STOP THIS ALMOST CRITICAL SITUATION (HOWEVER; SINCE HE INITIATED THE APPLICATION OF HIS INTERP OF THE 22 KT RULE; I DOUBT HE COULD HAVE KNOWN THIS SITUATION WAS ARISING). SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 90049: ON 6/FRI/88 I WAS OFF WORK; HOWEVER HEARD THAT THIS HAD HAPPENED. I ALSO HEARD THAT THIS HAD BEEN RPTED. HOWEVER; SINCE THIS IS A VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION; I FELT THAT I SHOULD RPT IT; IN THE EVENT IT HASN'T BEEN RPTED. THIS MUST BE INVESTIGATED.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.