BE55 pilot reports deviating from the NOTWN2 departure from VGT due to possible malfunction or incorrect programing of new glass flight displays.
Synopsis
BE55 pilot reports deviating from the NOTWN2 departure from VGT due to possible malfunction or incorrect programing of new glass flight displays.
Narrative
The problem arose after I departed Runway 25 at VGT. I immediately noticed that the flight path did not display on my GPS screen nor on my PFD Flight Display. The Las Vegas Approach Controller asked about my incorrect flight path. I had made a right turn but did not have NAV steering to the published 313 degree radial. I was told that I was not on course. My onboard GPS displayed RUZCO Intersection to the west and I steered to it. Upon crossing RUZCO I executed a turn to the right to reverse direction to LAS VORTAC which was the next fix on the SID. My altitude was in a climb to 5;000 FT MSL. ATC said I was not on the published LAS radial of 320 degrees and gave me a heading. The rest of the flight was uneventful except that in the vicinity of the BLD VORTAC; ATC gave me a number to call after landing. I called and was told that a pilot deviation had been filed by the previous controller; who was now off duty. I had been scheduled for a recurrent training program. It includes ground school with a heavy concentration on GPS systems; and 4 hours of instruction in the pilot's airplane. Use of the GPS/PFD Flight Display was covered in detail. My perceptions with regard to this incident are that I should always have ready VOR backup in the event of glass panel failures/problems and that more frequent training opportunities are very important. Factors affecting my performance include that I was in transition from a King/PN-101 system to the GPS/PFD Flight Display; and I was just beginning to use approach plates on a tablet. One action not taken was to cancel IFR at the first instance and return to VGT for situation analysis on the ground. I completed the recurrent training program successfully and have a fresh biennial and instrument competency check. I am confident that I am now able to more effectively deal with this type of problem; be it equipment and/or human factors.
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.