An Air Carrier pilot reported they rejected takeoff due to an aircraft landing on an intersecting runway. Tower instructed the crew to use a taxiway that was occupied with another aircraft. After airborne TRACON did not respond to their request for a weather deviation and they encountered severe turbulence.
Synopsis
An Air Carrier pilot reported they rejected takeoff due to an aircraft landing on an intersecting runway. Tower instructed the crew to use a taxiway that was occupied with another aircraft. After airborne TRACON did not respond to their request for a weather deviation and they encountered severe turbulence.
Narrative
After getting into position on RWXX; radar showed heavy precipitation along ZZZZZ to ZZZZZ1. Visually the cumulonimbus clouds appeared further away; however the level of the rain on scope led me to request a hold for takeoff which at that moment is when the tower cleared us for takeoff. FO (First Officer) began to push thrust levers forward; and simultaneously tower canceled takeoff clearance. Reason became apparent when a Cherokee eventually crossed our runway while taking off on RW XY. The timing made it clear it would have been either a near miss with a high speed reject; or a worst case scenario with a collision. Tower had instructed us to exit the runway at taxiway 1 and I explained an aircraft was on taxiway 1. Then received instruction to taxi forward on runway and exit at taxiway 2. I later requested a heading for departure (preferably eastward) due to the radar. Tower said he did not have anything for precipitation on his screen which aligned more with what I thought I visually saw; and I replied I am sharing what has been provided by the onboard radar. He assigned 270 and I requested something more southwest if I am remembering my request correctly. He seemed to be coordinating with ATC; and eventually asked again if 270 was okay. I accepted the heading. When entering RW XX again; the radar did not indicate any precipitation with the same settings as the first attempt for takeoff. Five degrees tilt up. After takeoff; it was clear the original radar was erroneous information. We turned to 270 and contacted departure. While departing on a 270 heading; we requested a change of heading for a large cell along our path. ATC was not responding to our radio calls. I believe we may have received a clearance to ZZZZZ; however the FO was making a statement at the same time and first portion of ATC transmission was not heard. We immediately requested confirmation clearance was for our call sign; and ATC did not respond. Multiple attempts were then made; with the frequency not at saturation; and no response. I was about to transmit we are changing our heading to avert entering a heavy cell; and ATC then transmitted clearance to ZZZZZ; stating it with especially sharp and deliberate emphasis. We turned to ZZZZZ; and the new course took us directly into another cell. While attempting to call for a new heading to avert the second cell; ATC gave us a frequency change. New controller did not immediately respond when checking in and stating the need for a new heading; it took a few attempts. While ATC responded; we entered the cell. I responded in the midst of borderline severe turbulence. ATC then stated they were there to help and asked what we needed. We then exited the cell. I stated we were now clear of the storm.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.