B757 Captain reported APU failure during initial climb and return to departure airport.
Synopsis
B757 Captain reported APU failure during initial climb and return to departure airport.
Narrative
Aircraft was dispatched with the left generator deferred. FO was PF. On climb-out from ZZZ passing approximately 15;000' the APU faulted with associated load shedding and a small thump that was felt. FO continued to fly. As we ran the checklist; we requested to level at FL200 and to start a turn 'back toward ZZZ;' as I wasn't completely confident that the APU would restart and it would be beneficial to stay in the local area. ATC responded to our request for a turn toward ZZZ by clearing us after a short delay 'to ZZZ;' which we hadn't exactly asked for; but kept us closer to ZZZ. We reset and attempted to restart the APU per QRH procedure. The fault light did not re-appear; yet the APU did not start as expected; observed by continued loss of the utility busses (tried to reset) and APU EGT continually declining on the status page.We contacted Dispatch by VHF; and told our dispatcher that we would be [requesting priority handling] and returning. Workload was high but manageable. Options at this point were ZZZ off our nose at 40 miles; ZZZ1 was 40 miles to our side; and ZZZ2 behind us with a turn required. We chose ZZZ as it was most familiar and also the nearest airport in point of time.We [requested priority handling] and requested to return to ZZZ. Conducted a visual approach to runway XXR uneventfully. Had ARFF inspect the tail of the aircraft upon exiting the runway in case of un-annunciated fire or damage; then returned to the ramp.Physiology for myself and my first officer was good; with me coming off days off and a good rest prior to duty. As a crew; we've flown together several times over the past XX years to include the past X weeks of the bid period; and we work well together. The only thing I would change would be to request 'vectors to stay in the area a minute' vs. 'a turn back toward ZZZ;' which was misinterpreted; but of minor consequence in this case.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.