CARGO LGT HAS NOSE GEAR NOT EXTENDED INDICATION. INTO HOLDING TO SOLVE PROB.
Synopsis
CARGO LGT HAS NOSE GEAR NOT EXTENDED INDICATION. INTO HOLDING TO SOLVE PROB.
Narrative
EXTENDED LNDG GEAR; NO NOSEWHEEL INDICATION. EXECUTED MISSED/GAR. COORDINATED RADAR VECTORS AND HOLDING WITH BAY APCH. ENTERING HOLDING DISTRACTED BY PROC ITEMS; DELAYED OUTBOUND HOLDING LEG. IN ACFT WE RECEIVED NO EICAS MESSAGES; RETRACTED GEAR AND HANDLE WAS VERY STICKY; VIBRATION NOTED. USED GEAR DISAGREE CHKLIST AND EXTENDED GEAR MANUALLY -- STILL NO NOSE GEAR GREEN INDICATION. ABNORMAL NOSE GEAR VIBRATION NOTED. REPEATED FULL PROC TO NO AVAIL. TESTED LIGHT BULBS; NO INDICATION. REPLACED 1 NOSE GEAR BULB AND EXTENDED GEAR NORMALLY. 3 GREEN. LANDED SJC WITHOUT FURTHER FAULT INDICATIONS. THROUGHOUT THIS INCIDENT I FAILED TO DECLARE AN EMER. PERHAPS THAT WOULD HAVE ALLEVIATED SOME ADDITIONAL EXTERNAL PRESSURE. NEXT TIME I INTEND TO DECLARE AN EMER AND RECEIVE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FROM ALL SOURCES -- COCKPIT RESOURCE MGMNT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM ACN 259982: WE DID NOT DECLARE AN EMER WHILE WORKING THE GEAR PROB AND THEREFORE THIS RPT. THERE SEEMED TO BE NO CONFLICT WITH TFC OR CTLRS -- BUT JUST IN CASE!
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.