NMAC. FLC CONFUSION FOLLOWING TCASII RA.

Date: 1995-10 · Aircraft: A320 · Phase: climb

Anomalies: conflict-nmac|deviation-speed-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

NMAC. FLC CONFUSION FOLLOWING TCASII RA.

Narrative

DURING INITIAL CLB; TCASII GAVE US A TA AT 11:30 TO 12 O'CLOCK AND 2 MI; SAME ALT. OUT OF 11200 FT (APPROX) WE RECEIVED AN RA TO 'DSND.' ATC HAD ONLY 'UNVERIFIED' TFC AND APPARENTLY DID NOT HAVE TIME TO RESPOND TO OUR REQUEST FOR A VECTOR AWAY FROM THE TFC. TCASII THEN COMMANDED 'INCREASE DSCNT.' WE ATTEMPTED TO COMPLY WITH THE RA AND NEVER DID REACH THE GREEN AREA EVEN THOUGH WE WERE DOING MAX RATE OF DSCNT (5000 TO 8000 FPM DOWN). DURING THIS EVASIVE MANEUVER; WE EXCEEDED VMO BY 20 TO 25 KTS. UPON VISUALLY CONTACTING THE ALERT ACFT; IT WAS APPARENT TO BOTH THE FO AND MYSELF THAT THE PROPER MANEUVER WOULD HAVE BEEN TO CLB ABOVE THE TFC. WE NEVER DID HEAR 'CLR OF CONFLICT.' WE ALSO EXCEEDED 250 KIAS BELOW 10000 FT IN THIS EVASIVE MANEUVER. I THINK THE A320 TCASII DISPLAY IS FAULTY. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR'S COMMENT; 'I THINK THE A320 TCASII DISPLAY IS FAULTY'; IS BECAUSE THE RPTR BELIEVES THE RA COMMANDED EXCESSIVE DSCNT (5000 TO 8000 FPM) AND DURING THE MANEUVER THE ANALOG VERT SPD SCALE SHOWED SOLID RED. THEN; WHEN ACQUIRING THE INTRUDER ACFT VISUALLY; THE FLC'S CONSENSUS WAS THAT THE RA SHOULD HAVE COMMANDED A CLB INSTEAD OF DSCNT. RPTR'S ACFT WAS CLBING THROUGH 11200 FT AND LATER THE FAA TAPE REVIEW SHOWED THE INTRUDER TO BE A CESSNA 172 AT 11500 FT. THUS; THE COMMAND TO DSND WAS APPROPRIATE. HOWEVER; RPTR HAD JUST RECEIVED THE TFC ADVISORY FROM ATC; AND RPTR HAD REQUESTED A TURN. JUST AT THAT TIME THE RA COMMANDED 'INCREASE DSCNT' AND RPTR COMMENCED DSCNT (THE DSCNT COMMAND HAD ALREADY BEEN GIVEN; BUT RPTR PREFERRED TO TURN INSTEAD). ONCE DSNDING; THE RPTR DIDN'T KNOW WHY DISPLAY BECAME SOLID RED; BUT HE INCREASED THE DSCNT RATE UNTIL ACFT HAD DSNDED MORE THAN 1200 FT AND AIRSPD INCREASED TO VMO PLUS 20 TO 25 KTS (370 TO 375 KTS). AT THAT TIME THE ACFT PROBABLY WENT INTO PROTECTIVE OVERSPD MODE; BUT RPTR SAYS HE WAS USING FULL STICK PRESSURE TO COUNTERACT ANY PITCH UP TENDENCY FROM OVERSPD PROTECTION. RPTR IMMEDIATELY TOLD ATC THAT HE WAS FILING A NMAC. AS A RESULT THE REGIONAL FAA OFFICE CONTACTED THE RPTR TO CHK FURTHER. THEY HAD THE TAPES OF THE INCIDENT. WHEN RPTR REVIEWED THE INCIDENT WITH HIS COMPANY TRAINING DEPT; THEY TOLD HIM THAT HE DIDN'T FOLLOW THE CORRECT PROCS FOR THE TCASII RA AND HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN USING THE DIGITAL DSCNT READ OUT.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.