RPTR IMPLIES THERE IS A PROB WITH THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY NOISE ABATEMENT PROC BTWN SUCCESSIVE DEPS WITH MINIMAL 3 MI SEPARATION WHICH SUBSEQUENTLY REQUIRES THE DEP CTLR TO INTERCEDE TO ENSURE SEPARATION IS MAINTAINED.

Narrative

THE B727 DEPARTED FIRST; FOLLOWED BY THE MD88 WITH 3 NM SEPARATION. I INSTRUCTED THE B727 TO INCREASE SPD TO 250 KTS DUE TO TFC IN TRAIL. B727 REFUSED CITING COUNTY NOISE ABATEMENT PROCS. THE B727 WAS INSTRUCTED TO STOP CLB AND TURN S. PLT AGAIN REFUSED AND STATED HE WOULD COMPLY WITH INITIAL CLRNC TO ACCELERATE. MD88 WAS IMMEDIATELY TURNED N (WHICH WAS A VIOLATION OF NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA) TO AVOID LOSS OF STANDARD SEPARATION. IN CONCLUSION: THIS HAPPENS EVERY OTHER DAY HERE AT PBI AND I'M SICK OF IT. EITHER SOMEBODY IN A POS OF PWR DOES SOMETHING TO ELIMINATE THIS PROB OR THE CTLRS WILL DELAY THE TFC DEPARTING TO AVOID CAREER ENDING SEPARATION ERRORS. THIS IS MY 6TH RPT ON THIS VERY SUBJECT. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH NOISE ABATEMENT OFFICE REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: ANALYST LEARNED FROM A CALLBACK TO THE ARPT NOISE ABATEMENT OFFICE THAT THERE ARE DIFFERENT PROCS FOR GA AND ACR ACFT OPS. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR INDICATED THE PROCS UTILIZED ARE BASED ON COMPANY OR ACFT SPECS REGARDING CLBOUT AND SPD ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED TO HONOR THE NOISE PROC. RPTR INDICATED THAT NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN AGAINST THE COMPANY OF AN ACFT THAT WAS TAKEN OFF THE NOISE RTE BY ATC IN ORDER TO ENSURE SEPARATION WAS MAINTAINED WITH ANOTHER ACFT.