B757 CAPT CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO FOLLOW AN AIRBUS AND SLOWS WITHOUT ADVISING THE CTLR TO MAINTAIN A 3 MI SPACING.
Synopsis
B757 CAPT CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO FOLLOW AN AIRBUS AND SLOWS WITHOUT ADVISING THE CTLR TO MAINTAIN A 3 MI SPACING.
Narrative
AS I RECALL; THE SCENARIO TO THIS SIT WAS AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS A CLR AND SUNNY AFTERNOON AT PIT. WE WERE VECTORED DOWNWIND ON THE S SIDE OF THE ARPT FOR RWY 32. I WAS FLYING THE ACFT AND THE FO WAS MAKING THE RADIO CALLS. WE HAD A CHK CAPT RIDING THE JUMP SEAT. THE LAST VECTOR TO FINAL WAS A 050 DEG HDG TO FOLLOW AN AIRBUS ON FINAL. AT THIS POINT I RECALL BEING ASSIGNED A SPD OF 170 KTS. WE CALLED THE AIRBUS IN SIGHT AND WERE CLRED 'TO FOLLOW THE AIRBUS FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 32.' WITH MY EXPERIENCE THIS SEPARATION LOOKED CLOSE AND WE USED THE TCASII DISPLAY TO TRY AND STAY ABOUT 3 MI IN TRAIL AND NO CLOSER. AFTER TURNING IN BEHIND THE AIRBUS AND XCHKING FOR THE GS; THE FO CALLED OUT 2 1/2 MI ON THE TCASII. I STARTED SLOWING DOWN TO INCREASE THE SEPARATION. I DID NOT WANT TO GET CLOSER THAN 3 MI AS INDICATED ON THE TCASII DISPLAY. AT A SPD OF 155 KTS THE CTLR ASKED US ABOUT OUR SPD AND THE FO TOLD HIM OUR SPD. HE GOT ALL UPSET ABOUT TFC BEHIND US. AT THIS POINT MY FOCUS WAS ON FLYING THE AIRPLANE AND TRYING TO GET TO A 3 MI IN TRAIL SPACING AND STAY ON THE GLIDE PATH. BEING LESS THAN 3 MI HAS A HIGH PROBABILITY OF 'GOING AROUND.' WE CONTINUED THE APCH AND LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. AFTER DOING SOME RESEARCH; I AM CONFIDENT WE WERE OPERATING ACCORDING TO THE RULES AND GUIDELINES NOT ONLY SET DOWN FROM PUBLISHED FAA REGS AND MANUALS BUT ALSO WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES AND DIRECTIVES SET FORTH BY COMPANY OPERATING PROCS. ONCE I RECEIVED A VISUAL APCH CLRNC TO FOLLOW ANOTHER ACFT TO LNDG; IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN A SAFE DISTANCE AND ADJUST MY SPD ACCORDINGLY. ALONG WITH THESE THOUGHTS ARE A NUMBER OF ARTICLES ISSUED BY COMPANY ON THE VIRTUES OF A STABILIZED APCH. FLYING TOO FAST ON FINAL AND THEN NOT BEING ABLE TO SLOW DOWN FOR A STABLE APCH IS AGAINST THIS COMPANY POLICY. MY INTENT WAS TO COMPLY WITH THE LAST ASSIGNED CLRNC AND AVOID AN UNSTABILIZED APCH. GETTING CLOSER THAN 3 MI AND TRYING TO MAINTAIN 170 KTS WOULD HAVE NOT ACHIEVED THIS INTENT.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.