A320 FLC INVOLVED IN AN NMAC AFTER ACCEPTING AN ENRTE VISUAL SEPARATION CLB WITH OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC.

Date: 2000-03 · Aircraft: A320 · Phase: climb

Anomalies: conflict-nmac|deviation-altitude-excursion-from-assigned-altitude|deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

A320 FLC INVOLVED IN AN NMAC AFTER ACCEPTING AN ENRTE VISUAL SEPARATION CLB WITH OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC.

Narrative

DEPARTING DTW FOR ATL BTWN CAVVS INTXN AND VWV AT 17000 FT. CONVERSATION WENT LIKE THIS: ATC: ACR X; TFC 11 O'CLOCK POS; 10 MI; FL180 HIGHER WHEN CLR. ACR X: 'ROGER; TFC IN SIGHT.' ATC: 'ACR Y; TFC 11 O'CLOCK; POS; 10 MI; 17000 FT.' ACR Y: 'ROGER; TFC IN SIGHT.' ATC: ACR Y; MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION; HE'S GOING TO CLB THROUGH YOUR ALT.' I DON'T KNOW IF ACR Y RESPONDED; OR NOT. ATC STATED: 'ACR X; ACR Y'S GOING TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION; CLB; AND MAINTAIN FL230.' ACR X: 'ROGER; FL230.' AND WE (ACR X) STARTED CLBING. TCASII TFC; RA ALARMED; WHICH I EXPECTED SINCE LATERAL SEPARATION WAS LIKELY LESS THAN TCASII TOLERANCE; WHATEVER THAT IS. TCASII RA COMMANDED DSND. NOW ACR Y WAS CLOSE ENOUGH TO SEE THAT HE WAS IN A L TURN TOWARDS US. I DISENGAGED AUTOPLT AND LEVELED AS ACR Y PASSED VERY CLOSE ABOVE; VERY; VERY CLOSE. HE DID NOT PASS DIRECTLY OVER THE COCKPIT; BUT I'M CONFIDENT AT LEAST PART OF HIS ACFT WAS DIRECTLY OVER PART OF MINE. I AM CERTAIN VERT SEPARATION WAS UNDER 500 FT. VISUAL SEPARATION ENRTE AT NIGHT IS AN ACCEPTABLE PRACTICE TO THE FAA; BUT IT SHOULDN'T BE. VERY FEW PLTS HAVE ANY NIGHT FORMATION TRAINING AND DEVIATING FROM YOUR IFR RTE CLRNC TO MAINTAIN SEPARATION IS CONTRARY TO ALL OUR HABIT PATTERNS. I NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEGUN THAT CLB. THE ALPHA POS IS AGAINST THIS PROC AND I SHOULD HAVE FOLLOWED THEIR ADVICE.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.