A B727 SO RECEIVING IOE TRAINING NOTES THAT ITS DISTR PREVENTED HIM FROM BACKING UP THE PLTS; WHO WERE OPERATING WITH AUTOPLT OFF AS A RESULT OF NUMEROUS CHANGES TO HDG AND ALT CLRNCS; WITH THE END RESULT OF AN ALT OVERSHOOT.

Date: 2001-10 · Aircraft: B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model · Phase: descent

Anomalies: deviation-altitude-overshoot|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance

Synopsis

A B727 SO RECEIVING IOE TRAINING NOTES THAT ITS DISTR PREVENTED HIM FROM BACKING UP THE PLTS; WHO WERE OPERATING WITH AUTOPLT OFF AS A RESULT OF NUMEROUS CHANGES TO HDG AND ALT CLRNCS; WITH THE END RESULT OF AN ALT OVERSHOOT.

Narrative

WE WERE ON DSCNT INTO ATL. WE WERE BEING VECTORED BY ATL APCH CTL. THE AUTOPLT WAS DISCONNECTED DUE TO NUMEROUS ALT; HDG AND AIRSPD CHANGES. THE APCH CHKLIST WAS BEING RUN AS WE WERE CLRED FROM 10000 FT TO 9000 FT WITH A HDG CHANGE AND SLOWDOWN. 9000 FT WAS SET IN THE ALT WINDOW. PASSING THROUGH 8500 FT AS THE FO WAS FLYING; THE CAPT SAID 'I MISSED YOUR 1000 FT CALL; PASSING 8500 FT FOR 8000 FT.' THE FO ACKNOWLEDGED. WE ALL THOUGHT THAT 8000 FT WAS OUR CLRNC. REACHING 8000 FT; WE REALIZED THAT 9000 FT WAS SET IN THE ALT WINDOW. THE CAPT QUERIED APCH CTL ABOUT OUR CLRED ALT. HE REPLIED 'THE CLRNC WAS 9000 FT; BUT YOU ARE FINE WHERE YOU ARE.' THE CAPT ACKNOWLEDGED; AND THE REMAINDER OF THE DSCNT WAS UNEVENTFUL. NO OTHER ACFT WERE INVOLVED. I BELIEVE THIS HAPPENED BECAUSE OF THE HIGH WORKLOAD AT THAT TIME WITH THE AUTOPLT OFF. BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE B727 AUTOPLT; MULTIPLE PHASE OF FLT CHANGES ARE DIFFICULT. I DON'T KNOW WHY THERE WAS CONFUSION ABOUT WHICH ALT WE WERE CLRED TO. I WAS RECEIVING TRAINING AS A NEW SO ON IOE; WHICH MAY HAVE ADDED TO THE WORKLOAD AND MY ABILITY TO BACK UP THE CAPT AND FO.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.