A CLRNC TO STAY EA OF A STADIUM IS MISINTERPRETED AND A NO FLY ZONE WAS ENTERED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT SECURITY DIRECTIVES.

Date: 2001-10 · Aircraft: Regional Jet CL65; Undifferentiated or Other Model · Phase: approach

Anomalies: airspace-violation-all-types|deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance

Synopsis

A CLRNC TO STAY EA OF A STADIUM IS MISINTERPRETED AND A NO FLY ZONE WAS ENTERED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT SECURITY DIRECTIVES.

Narrative

WE WERE RETURNING IN THE AFTERNOON AND CMH WAS LNDG ON THE 10'S. WHEN WE CHKED IN WITH APCH THEY ASKED US TO REMAIN E OF STADIUM. WE RESPONDED THAT WE WOULD. TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT THIS WAS THE FIRST REVENUE FLT THAT I HAD OPERATED IN CLOSE TO 3 MONTHS. SO; I KNOW MY SKILLS IN SIT AWARENESS WERE A LITTLE RUSTY. BOTH OF US KNEW WHICH WAY E WAS; HOWEVER WE INTERPRETED IT TO STAY W OF THE STADIUM AND TURN OUR FINAL THERE. IT HAD SLIPPED BOTH OUR MINDS THAT THERE WAS A NO FLY ZONE OVER STADIUMS GAMES SINCE SEP/TUE/01. THAT BEING SAID WE INADVERTENTLY ENTERED THE NO FLY ZONE. APCH QUERIED US AND TOLD US THAT WE MUST HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD HIS DIRECTIONS. AFTER WE LANDED WE CHKED OUR RELEASE; AND THERE WERE NO NOTAMS IN IT SUGGESTING THE NO FLY ZONE. I KNOW THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR SOMETHING LIKE THIS AND ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR IT. I JUST FEEL THERE COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER COM WITH US AND APCH. SOMETHING LIKE 'DO NOT OVER FLY STADIUM' OR 'TEMPORARY FLT RESTR AROUND STADIUM; REMAIN CLR.' THINGS LIKE THAT MAY HELP US SHAKE THE RUST A LITTLE FASTER.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.