A CL65-RJ FLC FAILS TO FOLLOW THE CHARTED CLB PROC OUT OF BZN; MT.

Narrative

UPON INFORMING BZN GND CTL OF OUR IMPENDING PUSHBACK; WE WERE TOLD TO EXPECT CLRNC (TO DEN) ON THE TAXI AS WE WERE #2 FOR IFR DEP. ON THE TAXI; BUT PRIOR TO REACHING THE DEP END OF RWY 30; WE RECEIVED: '...CLRED TO DEN V86 LVM MBW AS FILED....' SHORTLY THEREAFTER; WE RECEIVED CLRNC FOR TKOF ON RWY 30; COMPLETED THE BEFORE TKOF CHKLISTS; AND DEPARTED FLYING RWY HDG. BZN TWR HANDED US OFF TO ZLC WHO THEN GAVE US A CLB TO FL290. WHILE CLBING OPPOSITE OUR DESIRED DIRECTION OF FLT; THE CAPT SAID HE WOULD QUERY ATC FOR A TURN ON COURSE IF ONE WASN'T RECEIVED BY 15000 FT. UPON REACHING 15000 FT; THE CAPT ASKED ATC FOR A TURN. SLC SAID WE WERE NOT IN RADAR CONTACT AND THEN ASKED OUR LOCATION. CAPT SAID ON A 300 DEG HDG; 20 MI OUT OF BZN. ATC ASKED IF TWR GAVE US RWY HDG. CAPT REPLIED YES. SLC THEN GAVE US DIRECT TO MBW. NOTHING FURTHER WAS MENTIONED BY ATC. ONCE LEVEL AT CRUISE ALT; I REVIEWED THE TKOF AND OBSTACLE DEP PROC PUBLISHED ON THE BACK OF THE COMPANY CHART. IT STATES ACFT DEPARTING RWY 30 SHOULD EXECUTE A 'CLBING L TURN TO 275 DEG HDG. ALL ACFT CLB VIA BZN 284 DEG RADIAL....' WE FAILED TO PERFORM THE PROC AS STATED. OBSTACLE CLRNC WAS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE DIRECTION OF INITIAL FLT. I BELIEVE THERE WERE SEVERAL CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THIS SIT: 1) MY UNFAMILIARITY WITH BZN. I RELIED ON THE CAPT TO PROVIDE INFO RELEVANT TO OPS IN THIS AREA. 2) WE FLEW A TRIP TO BZN 3 DAYS PRIOR; AND UPON OUR DEP OFF RWY 12; HAD BEEN GIVEN RWY HDG (CONTRARY TO THE TKOF AND OBSTACLE DEP PROC ON BACK OF THE COMPANY PROC).