A CL65 CREW MISSED THE LNDG RWY NUMBER CLRNC. THEY EXECUTED A GAR AFTER HEARING A CL65 RECEIVE OPPOSITE DIRECTION TKOF CLRNC.

Date: 2005-02 · Aircraft: Regional Jet CL65; Undifferentiated or Other Model · Phase: approach

Anomalies: conflict-airborne-conflict|deviation-track-heading-all-types|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-clearance|deviation-discrepancy-procedural-far

Synopsis

A CL65 CREW MISSED THE LNDG RWY NUMBER CLRNC. THEY EXECUTED A GAR AFTER HEARING A CL65 RECEIVE OPPOSITE DIRECTION TKOF CLRNC.

Narrative

WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL TO BGM. CAME UP ON TWR AND WERE CLRED TO LAND. I MISHEARD THE CTLR AND THOUGHT HE CLRED US TO LAND ON RWY 34. IN FACT; HE CLRED US ON RWY 28. THE CLRNC INTERRUPTED A CHKLIST WE WERE RUNNING AND I JUST DIDN'T CATCH THE 'RWY 28.' ON ABOUT A 2 MI FINAL; WE HEARD TWR CLR AN RJ INTO POS AND HOLD ON RWY 16. WE BROKE OFF OUR APCH WHEN WE HEARD THIS AND ASKED TWR FOR A DOWNWIND TO RWY 16 AS WE WERE TOO HVY TO COMFORTABLY LAND ON THE SHORT RWY. THIS WAS APPROVED. THEY CLRED THE OTHER RJ TO TKOF ON RWY 16 AND WE LANDED AFTER HIS DEP WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 647241: OUR FLT WAS CLRED INTO POS AND HOLD; ON RWY 16 BGM; BY TWR. THE OTHER FLT HAD BEEN CLRED TO LAND ON THE XING RWY (RWY 28). THEY INSTEAD LINED UP FOR LNDG ON RWY 34. AFTER MOVING INTO POS ON RWY 16; WE SPOTTED THE OTHER ACFT LINED UP FOR A LNDG ON RWY 34. WE ANNOUNCED IN POS ON RWY 16; VACATED THE RWY AND THE OTHER ACFT WENT AROUND. TWR SHOULD HAVE MONITORED THE POS OF THE LNDG ACFT AFTER THEY WERE ISSUED CLRNC TO LAND. THE INCIDENT WAS ONLY DISCOVERED BY OUR FLT CREW LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW WHILE WAITING TO DEPART. WHEN WE NOTIFIED TWR OF THE CONFLICT; WE RECEIVED NO RESPONSE AND TAXIED CLR OF THE RWY ON OUR OWN INITIATIVE.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.