B757-200 ARR TO JFK EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING FREQ SATURATION; SUSPECTING POSITION COMBINATIONS AS A CAUSAL FACTOR.
Synopsis
B757-200 ARR TO JFK EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING FREQ SATURATION; SUSPECTING POSITION COMBINATIONS AS A CAUSAL FACTOR.
Narrative
FREQ SATURATION -- UNSAFE SITUATION! FROM OUR HDOF TO APCH CTL FROM ZNY WE HAD A HARD TIME CHKING IN. AFTER LISTENING A FEW MINS WE REALIZED THAT THE CTLR WAS HANDLING ALL ACFT DEPARTING AND ARRIVING INTO THE JFK ARPT AREA FROM TWR CTL UP TO CTR CTL. I'M NOT SURE IF EVERY EVENING IS LIKE THIS; BUT THIS WAS NOT A SAFE SITUATION. THE CTLR WAS SO BUSY HE ISSUED CLRNCS TO 4-5 ACFT IN A ROW BEFORE ANYONE COULD RESPOND. ACFT STEPPED ON EACH OTHER'S CALLS MULTIPLE TIMES MAKING THE SITUATION EVEN WORSE. WE WERE RECLRED TO 13000 FT WHILE DSNDING TO OUR ORIGINAL 16000 FT CLRNC. IT IS AN UNCOMFORTABLE FEELING TO GO BELOW THE ORIGINAL 16000 FT TOWARD 13000 FT WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO READ BACK THE CLRNC; BUT WE COULDN'T GET OUR CALL IN. WE HEARD AN ACR X DEP AIRPLANE BUST HIS ASSIGNED 6000 FT LEVELOFF WHEN THE CTLR TOLD HIM TO STOP HIS CLB AT 8000 FT. HE THEN HAD THE ACFT VISUALLY CLR THE OTHER ACR X THAT WAS AT 8000 FT ALSO. ANOTHER DEP ACFT GOT HIS FREQ HDOF INCORRECT. THE FREQ WAS SO BUSY IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR FLUENT ENGLISH SPEAKING CREW MEMBERS TO UNDERSTAND. A FOREIGN FLT WAS HAVING DIFFICULTY UNDERSTANDING HIS CLRNCS. THIS IS AN INTL ARPT? I HAVE NEVER SEEN A FREQ AND CTLR THIS BUSY IN MY 22 YRS OF FLYING. IT WAS LIKE BEING ON GND CTL AT ORD DURING A PEAK DEP BANK EXCEPT AT LEAST THERE YOU ARE ON THE GND ONLY DOING 5-15 KTS AND YOU CAN ALWAYS STOP IF YOU'RE NOT SURE OF A TAXI CLRNC. I WOULD RECOMMEND AT LEAST A SEPARATE DEP AND ARR CTLR/FREQ WITH THIS VOLUME OF ACFT. I'M NOT SURE THE SITUATION WAS EVEN LEGAL FOR A SINGLE CTLR TO HANDLE.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.