A CRJ900 DIVERTED TO A NEARBY ARPT AFTER BOTH ANGLE OF ATTACK STALL VANES FAILED CAUSING A STALL WARNING IN FLT. AN EMER WAS DECLARED.

Date: 2008-01 · Aircraft: Regional Jet 900 (CRJ900) · Phase: cruise

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-less-severe

Synopsis

A CRJ900 DIVERTED TO A NEARBY ARPT AFTER BOTH ANGLE OF ATTACK STALL VANES FAILED CAUSING A STALL WARNING IN FLT. AN EMER WAS DECLARED.

Narrative

WHILE ENRTE AT CRUISE FL390; THE AUTOPLT DISENGAGED. I RE-ENGAGED THE AUTOPLT AND THEN I NOTICED VSI FLUCTUATIONS OF +/-100 FT; FOLLOWED BY THE AUTOPLT DISENGAGING AGAIN. WITHIN 10 SECONDS WE RECEIVED A RED STALL WARNING LIGHT; STICK SHAKERS ON BOTH CTL PANELS; A STALL FAIL MESSAGE CAUTION ON THE ED1 AND THE PFD WAS SHOWING FULL RED INDICATION BARS ON THE AIRSPD TAPE. I THEN ADVISED THE FO TO CALL ATC AND TELL THEM WE ARE DSNDING TO FL360. I DSNDED TO FL360 WITHOUT THE AUTOPLT ENGAGED AND I LEVELED AT FL360 AND RE-ENGAGED THE AUTOPLT. ONCE I ENGAGED THE AUTOPLT; THE ACFT STARTED A CLB OF 1000/FPM. I THEN DISENGAGED THE AUTOPLT MANUALLY AND TOLD THE FO TO TELL ATC WE ARE DSNDING TO A LOWER ALT. ATC GAVE US FL340 AND I DSNDED TO FL340; LEVELED THE ACFT; AND TURNED THE AUTOPLT BACK ON. WITHIN 1 MIN OF TURNING THE AUTOPLT BACK ON; AND LEVEL AT FL340; THE AUTOPLT DISENGAGED AND THE STALL INDICATIONS RETURNED. I THEN DECLARED AN EMER THROUGH THE FO TO ATC AND TOLD THEM WE WERE DSNDING TO A LOWER ALT WHICH ENDED UP BEING FL210. THROUGHOUT THE DSCNT FROM FL340 TO FL210; THE STALL INDICATIONS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED CONTINUED ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE DSCNT TO APPROX FL280. I WAS IN A 3000-4000/FPM DSCNT WHILE THE STALL INDICATIONS WERE OCCURRING. AFTER APPROX FL280; THE STALL INDICATIONS CEASED AND I PROCEEDED TO DSND TO FL210 AND I ENGAGED THE AUTOPLT. WITHIN 10 MINS; THE AUTOPLT DISENGAGED AND DUE TO THE HIGH WORKLOAD; I RE-ENGAGED THE AUTOPLT AND IT OPERATED NORMALLY THROUGHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE FLT. THROUGHOUT THE EVENT THE ACFT NEVER FELT LIKE IT WAS ABOUT TO STALL EVEN THOUGH I WAS RECEIVING ALL INDICATIONS FROM THE STALL SYS THAT THE ACFT WAS NEAR A STALL. WHILE WE WERE IN THE DSCNT FROM FL340 TO FL210 THE FO AND I WERE COMMUNICATING WITH DISPATCH AND ATC TO FIND A SUITABLE DIVERSION ARPT. DISPATCH INFORMED ME THAT ZZZ WAS SUITABLE; AND WE HAD THE APPROPRIATE PLATES TO DIVERT THERE. WHILE ENRTE TO ZZZ; WE REVIEWED THE STALL FAIL CHKLIST AND POSSIBLE AFT DOOR OPEN DUE TO THE AFT GOOD BEING DEFERRED. WE STAYED IN CONTACT WITH DISPATCH AND PROCEEDED TO ZZZ AND LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT. WE REQUESTED CFR STANDING BY UPON LNDG. THROUGHOUT THE FLT WE COMMUNICATED SEVERAL TIMES TO THE FLT ATTENDANTS ON OUR SITUATION AND THAT WE WERE DIVERTING TO ZZZ. WE TOLD THE FLT ATTENDANTS TO PREPARE FOR AN EMER. I MADE THE DECISION TO DECLARE AN EMER AND DIVERT TO ZZZ BASED ON THE INFO I WAS RECEIVING THROUGHOUT THE EVENT. ONCE THE PAX DEPLANED AND ALL OF THE PAPERWORK WAS COMPLETED; THE GND CREW AT ZZZ INFORMED ME THAT ALL OF THE CARRY-ON AND CHKED BAGS WERE PLACED IN THE AFT CARGO BIN. THE FORWARD AND CTR BINS WERE EMPTY. OVERALL; I FEEL THE EVENT POSSIBLY OCCURRED DUE TO AFT CTR OF GRAVITY OR AN ELECTRICAL ANOMALY ASSOCIATED WITH THE STALL SYS. OR; A COMBINATION OF THE TWO. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: REPORTER STATED THAT FOLLOWING THIS EVENT; A SIMULATOR PERIOD DETERMINED THAT THE ONLY WAY THIS EVENT COULD OCCUR WOULD BE FOR BOTH STALL VANES TO HAVE FAILED. A SINGLE FAILURE WOULD NOT GIVE THE FULL STALL WARNING WITH THE SPEED TAPE AND PFD COMMANDS. THE REPORTER'S ACR WAS NOT CONCERNED WITH BAGGAGE LOADING BECAUSE THE WEIGHT WAS NOT GREAT ENOUGH TO CAUSE A CG CONCERN.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.