A320 FLIGHT CREW REJECTS TAKEOFF WHEN N1 VIBRATION EXCEEDS LIMITS. CREW HAD PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH THIS AIRCRAFT BUT MAINTENANCE COULD FIND NOTHING WRONG.
Synopsis
A320 FLIGHT CREW REJECTS TAKEOFF WHEN N1 VIBRATION EXCEEDS LIMITS. CREW HAD PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH THIS AIRCRAFT BUT MAINTENANCE COULD FIND NOTHING WRONG.
Narrative
ACFT X WAS THE ACFT WE HAD DIVERTED TO ZZZ IN FROM ZZZ1 THE NIGHT BEFORE. WE HAD AT THAT TIME ENCOUNTERED HIGH N1 VIBRATION (6.1 ON ENG #2) DURING OUR GAR AND SUBSEQUENT DIVERSION. WHILE IT MAY HAVE BEEN THE ICING CONDITIONS WE FLEW IN; WE WERE NOT SURE; AND ENG #1; WHICH FLEW IN THE SAME CONDITIONS; WAS FINE. WE WROTE IT UP AND THE NEXT DAY FOUND THAT ENG #2 HAD BEEN INSPECTED; RUN; AND NOTHING FOUND AMISS. DURING PREFLT INSPECTION; THE FO SPUN THE ENG #2 N1 FAN; AND NOTICED A GRINDING SOUND. I WENT DOWN AND SPUN THE ENG #2 N1; AND HEARD THE SAME SOUND; LIKE THAT OF GRAVEL IN A ROTATING TIN CAN. WE WROTE IT UP. I SUSPECTED ICE CHUNKS LOOSE IN THE ENG #2 NOSE CONE; THOUGH I HAD NO IDEA HOW THAT COULD HAPPEN. WITH MAINT ABOARD; WE RAN THE ENG; AT LOW PWR; ANTI-ICE ON; UNTIL IT WARMED UP. NO UNUSUAL OR ABNORMAL INDICATIONS WERE NOTED; BUT AS THE N1 SPOOLED DOWN; MAINT NOTICED ICE PELLETS BEING SLUNG FROM THE AREA OF THE NOSE CONE. I WENT DOWN SAW THEM TOO. THE ENG WAS AGAIN SIGNED OFF; AND WE PUSHED BACK FOR ZZZ. TKOF WAS PLANNED FOR FLEX OF 37 DEGS; FLAPS 2 DEGS; ENG ANTI-ICE OFF. WHEN THE FO STOOD THE THROTTLES UP AND THE ENGS BEGAN TO SPOOL; ENG #2 VIBRATION QUICKLY REACHED 7. I ELECTED TO REJECT THE TKOF AND DID SO ACCORDING TO PROCS. THRUST WAS NEVER FULLY SET; AND THE SPD WAS VERY LOW; I WOULD ESTIMATE NO MORE THAN 50 KTS; THOUGH THAT'S A GUESS. WE EXITED THE RWY AND RETURNED TO THE GATE; LEAVING BOTH ENGS RUNNING. ENG #2 VIBRATION WAS NORMAL AT IDLE ON THE GND. NO EMER WAS DECLARED. FLT WAS CANCELED.
More incidents for this aircraft family →
Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.