An A320 flight crew reported efforts by ramp personnel to achieve an on time departure might have been inappropriate.

Date: 2009-09 · Aircraft: A320 · Phase: ground

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

An A320 flight crew reported efforts by ramp personnel to achieve an on time departure might have been inappropriate.

Narrative

Prior to departure I received four calls from the Pushback Driver. All four interrupted cockpit duties; i.e. briefings; setups and checklists. Only two of these calls were necessary. After the third call informing that the ramp was ready for pushback; I replied; 'Roger; standby'. It was about 5 minutes prior to departure time. Two minutes later the Driver called me and; IN VIOLATION OF SOP; asked me to release the brakes for an 'on time departure'. I firmly informed the Driver that 1) they were delaying the departure by interrupting the checklist; 2) they had been told to 'standby' and they should not call us unless there is an emergency or some very important reason; 3) we were 3 minutes from departure time. The Driver made it clear to me that the Ramp Supervisor was standing there and had ordered the Driver to ask for brake release. I know that management/supervisory people get bonuses based on their station's on-time performance. So is it OK for THEM to try to pad their paycheck by violating SOP? Not too long ago; management was threatening to TERMINATE any pilot who released the parking brake in violation of SOP because the pilot might get a few more minutes of pay. This Supervisor should be disciplined for attempting to coerce a junior employee into violating SOP and I should receive an apology in writing from his Supervisor.

Second reporter narrative

... we noticed the Station Manager walk up to the push-back crew. It was apparent to us he was encouraging the push crew to be more aggressive and insistent on getting us to release our brakes. It appears that; in his mind; on-time criteria is much more important than safety.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.