A CRJ200 developed a flap asymmetry after take off. The asymmetry was felt in the flight controls and indicated on the EICAS flap synoptic page but not indicated on the flap gauge.

Date: 2009-12 · Aircraft: Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200)

Anomalies: aircraft-equipment-problem-critical

Synopsis

A CRJ200 developed a flap asymmetry after take off. The asymmetry was felt in the flight controls and indicated on the EICAS flap synoptic page but not indicated on the flap gauge.

Narrative

After takeoff; during flap retraction; the left flap froze at 4 degrees and was accompanied by a roll tendency. The flap remained frozen for approximately 5 - 8 minutes and then slowly made its way to a 0 degree condition. There was not an associated FLAPS FAIL message however. We did refer to the QRH for FLAPS FAIL and discussed the issue with the First Officer and also with maintenance. The First Officer and I felt that it would be prudent to continue with the QRH and run the FLAPS FAIL checklist. We then ran the FLAPS FAIL checklist and notified ATC of our issue and requested the longest runway and also requested emergency personnel to standby as a precaution. The landing was uneventful and we taxied to the gate with no further incident. At the gate; maintenance was contacted and a detailed notation was made in the can. The event occurred due to a malfunction of the flap system. As explained above; due to the unknown condition or operational ability of the flaps; we did elect to proceed with the QRH FLAPS FAIL procedure. While conferring with the First Officer; this decision was made in order to avoid landing in an undesirable and untrained configuration. We felt that it would be more desirable to land Flaps 0 (a condition that we are trained to do) than risk operating the flaps and them failing unevenly (perhaps at a lower altitude when going from say 30 degrees to 45 degrees). The emergency was declared solely as a precaution due high approach and landing speeds. In all; we felt that this was the most conservative approach to this unique problem.

NASA callback

The reporter stated that after landing Maintenance Personnel activated the flaps and they operated normally. Maintenance Personnel did not simply sign the maintenance log off as 'could not duplicate' but continued trouble shooting the system. The reporter is still certain that an actual flap asymmetry occurred because the EICAS flap synoptic page indicated the left flap at 4 degrees with the right flap at 0 and because of the aircraft's physical roll tendency. During this event the instrument panel flap gauge indicated 0 since that gauge indicates system position and not individual flap position. Not until the EICAS flap synoptic page was selected did the crew see what was actually occurring. The reporter's carrier has had a number of flap related issues but has instigated some mitigating procedures; such as decreasing the flap extend speed; which seems to have helped. There was no flap asymmetry indication of any type and the reporter did not know for certain if the EICAS flaps fail annunciation includes the flap asymmetry parameter. The flight crew training and manuals do not provide detail about what system anomalies will trigger an EICAS message.

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.