B757 flight crew reports forgetting set QNH during a night visual approach to an international airport. This results in a EGPWS alert and go around where the crew discovers their error passing through Transition Level.

Date: 2012-02 · Aircraft: B757-200 · Phase: approach

Anomalies: deviation-discrepancy-procedural-published-material-policy

Synopsis

B757 flight crew reports forgetting set QNH during a night visual approach to an international airport. This results in a EGPWS alert and go around where the crew discovers their error passing through Transition Level.

Narrative

Night; VMC arrival; all ATC requests were normal; except for a request to maintain high speed until late on base leg. By request; we were still at 250 on base; turning final. That said the spacing was good; with approximately five miles behind and in front of our two closest targets. Due to Continuous Descent Approach (CDA); we never leveled off; maintaining a nearly constant descent from FL340; all the way to the runway. The approach checklist was complete and holding on the local altimeter setting; but we failed to set the local altimeter as we started the turn from base to final. Consequently; we acquired the glideslope at approximately 6;000 FT and maintained the glide for the descent. Unfortunately; due to the incorrect altimeter; the aircraft THOUGHT that we were 450 FT lower than we actually were. While we were visually proceeding to the runway (which was in sight); using the glideslope for guidance; and we actually had correct terrain clearance; we received an EGPWS alert that we were too low; due to the incorrect altimeter input. Although we had an excellent visual picture of terrain and the runway; we complied with company policy with a CFIT recovery. During the resulting Go-Around; we were instructed to contact Departure Control; and were given an altitude of FL070. Since the transition on climb-out is 6;000; we both attempted to set our altimeters to standard; and that was when we realized that they were still in the standard setting. The correct local altimeter setting was 1031; and we had performed the approach with 1013.

Second reporter narrative

[Narrative #2 had no additional information.]

More incidents for this aircraft family →

Source: NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (public domain). Reports are voluntary submissions and are not verified by NASA.