5 Jul 2008: BOEING B747 306 — Saudi Arabian Airlines

5 Jul 2008: BOEING B747 306 (N1) — Saudi Arabian Airlines

No fatalities • Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Probable cause

Failure of the low pressure turbine stage 3 disk due to a design that is vulnerable to high pressure turbine unbalance-induced synchronous vibration that cannot be detected in flight, and the subsequent uncontained engine failure.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On July 4, 2008 a Saudi Arabian Airlines Boeing 747-300 experienced a No. 1 General Electric (GE) CF6-50 engine uncontained failure during initial climb after takeoff from the King Abdul-Aziz International Airport (JED), Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The non-commercial flight was undertaken to reposition the airplane from JED to Jakarta, Indonesia for maintenance, including maintenance to the No. 1 engine due to degraded power. The flight crew reported that they reduced the No. 1 engine thrust following takeoff after noticing fluctuations in its exhaust gas temperature and fan speed (N1) indications. According to the captain, the fluctuations continued during the initial climb, and about one minute later, at about 1,100 feet above ground level (AGL), the engine’s low oil pressure warning illuminated and the oil quantity indicator read zero. The flight crew shut down the engine, dumped fuel, and returned to the airport, where an uneventful landing was accomplished. No injuries were reported. Post-flight inspection of the airplane found that the aft end of the No. 1 engine was missing, and that the airplane’s left wing and flaps were damaged from impact penetrations.

The liberated engine components were recovered about 2½ miles from the departure end of the runway. Photographs of the engine and the recovered parts provided to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) indicated that the engine’s low pressure turbine (LPT) stage 3 (S3) disk had separated at the forward spacer arm, and that all components aft of the separation had been liberated.

The GACA elected to send the liberated components to GE for metallurgical evaluation. Following the initial evaluation of these components, the forward spacer arm section (forward fracture surface) was removed from the engine at Jeddah and sent to GE for metallurgical evaluation.

MATERIALS ANALYSIS

The LPT S3 disk fracture surfaces were examined by GE at their Evandale, Ohio facility, with oversight from the NTSB. The examination found that the S3 LPT disk had separated circumferentially near the fillet between the spacer arm and the disk rim. This fracture surface was damaged by post-fracture smearing, however interpretable areas showed damage consistent with high amplitude/high cycle fatigue (HAF) from multiple initiation sites, primarily on the inner diameter. The features indicated that, once initiated, the cracks propagated rapidly through the spacer arm thickness and joined to form a single circumferential crack, resulting in disk separation. The material met all specifications except for a small deviation in the as-large-as grain size requirement, which likely played no role in the fatigue fracture.

TESTS AND RESEARCH

According to GE, when a high level of high pressure turbine (HPT)rotor unbalance occurs in the CF6-50 engine, the resulting synchronous vibration forces can interact with the engine’s LPT through a common bearing support and excite a bladed-disk vibration mode within the engine operating range.

A post-incident video borescope inspection (BSI) of the engine’s HPT found that three HPT stage one blades over a nine-blade sector were missing airfoil material, equivalent to the loss of about 1.8 blade airfoils. According to GE, a localized HPT blade airfoil loss equivalent to 1.8 blade airfoils will result in HPT rotor unbalance large enough to excite the bladed-disk vibration mode in the LPT S3 disk.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The investigation of this incident was initially conducted by the GACA, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The investigation was delegated to the United States on April 11, 2009.

Contributing factors

  • cause Design

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.