No fatalities

22 Jul 2008: Grumman 164A — Carroll Flying Service — Lake Providence, LA

Lake Providence, LA, United States

On 22 Jul 2008, a Grumman 164A operated by Carroll Flying Service was involved in an aviation accident near Lake Providence, LA. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane while maneuvering during an aerial application. Contributing to the accident was the wind gust. This summary draws on records from NTSB.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

A commercial pilot in a bi-wing agricultural airplane descended to 3-4 feet above a rice crop, then attempted to climb. A wind gust pushed the aircraft off the swath path. While realigning with right rudder and back pressure, the right main wheel struck a levy, causing the airplane to flip three times and come to rest near vertical. The engine was torn from mounts, and the empennage and tail separated. No mechanical deficiencies were reported.

Accident Sequence

The commercial rated pilot was operating a bi-wing agricultural airplane. He reported that he had descended along a line of approximately 100-foot-tall trees and entered a swath path that was about 3-4 feet high above a rice crop. The normal operating height for the airplane above this particular crop was typically 8 to 12 feet. As the pilot attempted to climb to a higher altitude, a wind gust pushed the airplane from the right and off its swath path.

Instead of first adjusting for the low altitude, the pilot attempted to realign the airplane back onto the swath path by applying right rudder and slight back pressure on the control stick. This application of right rudder reduced lift, causing the airplane to descend further. As a result, the airplane's right main wheel struck a levy. The impact caused the airplane to flip over three times before it came to rest in a near vertical position.

Damage

Examination of the airplane revealed substantial damage. The engine was torn from its mounts, and the empennage and tail section separated from the airframe. The specific extent of other structural damage was not detailed in the report.

Pilot Report

The pilot stated that there were no mechanical deficiencies with the airplane prior to the accident. No further information was provided regarding the pilot's actions or other potential factors.

Contributing factors

Causes

Pilot

Other contributing factors

Contributed to outcome