23 Jan 2009: CESSNA 172E

23 Jan 2009: CESSNA 172E (N5420T) — Unknown operator

No fatalities • Plano, TX, United States

Probable cause

A loss of engine power in flight due to fuel exhaustion as a result of the pilot's inadequate fuel planning.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On January 23, 2009, at 1554 central standard time, a Cessna 172E, N5420T, was substantially damaged upon impact with terrain during a forced landing following a loss of engine power near Plano, Texas. The private pilot and passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and no flight plan was filed for the Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The flight originated from a private airfield near Powderly, Texas, and was en route to the Dallas Air Park (F69), Dallas, Texas.

While en route to the destination airport, the pilot informed air traffic controllers that he had experienced an engine failure and was attempting to restart the engine. Unable to get the engine restarted, the pilot performed a forced landing to a golf course. During the landing roll, the airplane entered a sand bunker which buckled the nose landing gear. The airplane came to rest nose low in the bunker and substantial damage was sustained to the engine firewall. The pilot and passenger were able to egress the airplane normally.

In a telephone interview with the pilot, the airplane was last "topped off" two days prior to the accident at Cobb's Field (PRX), Paris, Texas. The pilot flew the airplane from PRX to Parker County Airport (WEA), Weatherford, Texas, and later from WEA to a private airstrip near Powderly, Texas. The pilot estimates that he flew between 2 1/2 to 2 3/4 hours and used about 20 to 22 gallons of fuel before departing the private airstrip. The pilot added that he departed the private airstrip with 17 gallons and flew approximately 50 to 55 minutes en route towards F69 before encountering the loss of engine power. The pilot normally plane a rate of consumption of 8 gallons of fuel per hour.

Upon recovery of the airplane, approximately 3 gallons of fuel was recovered from the airplane. A small, unmeasured amount of fuel drained from the airplane's fuel lines during disassembly. An on-scene examination of the airplane by a responding Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector did not identify a fuel leak from the fuel tanks, or fuel residue from the fuel tank drains. In a telephone interview with the golf course manager, he stated that the sand bunker had been examined and was found free of fuel contamination.

An engine run was conducted under the supervision of the NTSB and the FAA. The engine remained attached to the airplane via the engine mounts. The airplane wings were previously removed for transportation and remained removed. A fuel container was installed that fed fuel to the fuel lines located at the left and right wing attachment points. The engine was controlled via the controls located in the cockpit.

The gascolator was found approximately 1/3 full of fuel. The carburetor, with the fuel lines still attached, was examined and found to have a broken attachment flange; the carburetor was removed and replaced with a test carburetor. The engine was fitted with the test carburetor and a replacement propeller. The engine started and ran without any anomaly at various throttle settings. The fuel tanks were selected through BOTH, LEFT, and RIGHT before returning to BOTH without any hesitation in the production of engine power. Magneto drops were between 50 to 75 rpm per magneto.

The accident carburetor was turned upside-down to allow the drainage of any fuel. Only a few drops were observed to drain from the carburetor. A temporary repair was applied to the original carburetor. A second engine run was conducted with the repaired carburetor; again, the engine started and ran without any anomaly at various throttle settings. The fuel tanks were selected through BOTH, LEFT, and RIGHT before returning to BOTH without any hesitation in the production of engine power.

A review of the airplane's type certificate data sheet revealed that the unusable fuel in a Cessna 172E is 3 gallons. Attempts to obtain a completed Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report (NTSB Form 6120.1) from the pilot were unsuccessful.

Contributing factors

  • cause Fluid level
  • cause Pilot

Conditions

Weather
VMC, wind 180/12kt, vis 10sm

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.