No fatalities

3 Mar 2009: MAULE M-5 (N9166E) — John A. Reed — Calexico, CA

Calexico, CA, United States

On 3 Mar 2009, a MAULE M-5 (registration N9166E) operated by John A. Reed was involved in an aviation accident near Calexico, CA. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

A Maule M-5 sustained substantial damage after nosing over during a precautionary landing in a field near Calexico, California; the pilot and passenger were not injured.

Accident Details

On March 3, 2009, about 1020 Pacific standard time, a Maule M-5, registration N9166E, experienced a rough running engine while maneuvering. The commercial pilot, who was also the registered owner and operator, initiated a precautionary landing to an open field located three miles west of Calexico, California. The pilot and a passenger were not injured. The airplane was being operated as a visual flight rules (VFR) aerial observation flight under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed. The local flight had departed Calexico approximately 20 minutes prior to the accident.

Accident Sequence

According to a telephone conversation between the pilot and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator-in-charge, about 20 minutes after takeoff, while maneuvering, the airplane developed a rough running engine. The pilot elected to perform a precautionary landing to a nearby field. During the landing roll, the airplane encountered soft, uneven terrain and nosed over.

Damage

Examination of the airplane by the pilot revealed that the vertical stabilizer and rudder were structurally damaged. The airplane sustained substantial damage.

Post-Accident Examination

The pilot conducted a post-accident examination of the engine and airframe, which revealed no indication as to the basis of the rough running engine. Subsequent to the examination, the pilot began repairs on the engine and airframe. The engine and airframe were not examined by the National Transportation Safety Board.