No fatalities

25 Feb 2011: AEROSTAR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION PA-60-601P — Bravo Aviation, LLC — Princeton, NJ

Princeton, NJ, United States

On 25 Feb 2011, an AEROSTAR AIRCRAFT CORPORATION PA-60-601P operated by Bravo Aviation, LLC was involved in an aviation accident near Princeton, NJ. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot’s failure to stop the airplane resulting in a runway overrun. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 1 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

A pilot conducted a GPS approach to runway 28. The airplane touched down at 75 knots on a wet surface, began hydroplaning, and departed the runway, resulting in damage to the nose landing gear and forward pressure bulkhead.

Synopsis

A pilot flying a single-engine airplane encountered a runway excursion after hydroplaning during landing at an airport. The event occurred around 1130 local time. The airplane touched down on a wet runway, began hydroplaning approximately 1,000 feet before the end, and rolled past the departure end. The nose landing gear struck a depression, causing it to twist, and the forward pressure bulkhead was found cracked afterward. No mechanical issues were reported.

Flight Details

The pilot was executing a GPS approach to runway 28. During the approach, he maintained 120 knots with 20 degrees of flaps. He extended full flaps about 1 mile from the runway and reduced speed to 100 knots, then crossed the threshold at 80 knots. Touchdown occurred at about 75 knots. The pilot applied brakes gently on touchdown, stating he was unable to apply hard braking.

Weather

Before the approach, the pilot checked the wind at a nearby airport, reported as 20 knots with gusts to 25 knots. The onboard GPS receiver indicated wind from 010 degrees at 12 knots. The pilot observed that the windsock at the destination was not fully extended. The destination airport had an automated weather observing system (AWOS). Twelve observations near the accident time (1130 local, 1630 UTC) showed wind from 230 degrees at 8 knots with gusts to 18 knots.

Accident Sequence

After touching down on the wet runway, the airplane began hydroplaning about 1,000 feet before the end of the runway. The pilot was unable to stop the airplane, and it continued past the departure end of the runway. The nose landing gear then entered a small depression, causing it to twist. The forward pressure bulkhead was later found to be cracked.

Post-Accident Examination

The pilot reported no mechanical failure or malfunction. The examination revealed the nose landing gear was twisted and the forward pressure bulkhead had a crack. No other damage was specified.

Contributing factors

PilotIncorrect use/operation