No fatalities

26 Jun 2011: PIPER PA-32-300 — Three Wing Flying Services — Bridgeport, CT

Bridgeport, CT, United States

On 26 Jun 2011, a PIPER PA-32-300 operated by Three Wing Flying Services was involved in an aviation accident near Bridgeport, CT. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from a blast fence on final approach to land. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

A pilot flying to regain night currency impacted a blast fence with the left wing during a landing approach, resulting in wing separation. The pilot reported difficulty distinguishing the fence from runway markings.

Flight Details

The pilot was flying to regain night currency, which had lapsed two weeks prior. The intention was to fly three landing pattern approaches and perform three full-stop landings. According to the pilot, the takeoff and initial climb out to a left downwind were normal. A slight haze was present in the vicinity of the airport.

Accident Sequence

While turning to the base leg of the approach, the pilot trimmed the aircraft for 90 mph and lowered the flaps to the first notch. The pilot then observed two white lights on the Vertical Approach Slope Indicator (VASI), indicating the aircraft was above the glide slope. The pilot adjusted the trim to maintain 80 mph and extended the flaps to the third notch. Subsequently, the left wing of the airplane struck a 12-foot-tall blast fence located 20 feet from the end of the runway. The impact resulted in the left wing separating from the fuselage.

Post-Accident Statements

After the accident, the pilot stated that the blast fence was indistinguishable from the runway threshold markings. The VASI was set for a 3-degree glide path, and the runway threshold was displaced 319 feet. The blast fence was properly marked with red and white checker markings on the interior side and was not required to be lit by federal aviation administration facility requirements. The pilot was familiar with the airport.

Contributing factors

Causes

PilotAltitude — Not attained/maintained

Other contributing factors

Contributed to outcome