No fatalities

Cessna 172N Nosed Over During Forced Landing in Water Near Orange Beach, Alabama (N109DP)

Orange Beach, AL, United States

On July 4, 2011, a CESSNA 172N (registration N109DP) operated by GULF COAST AERIAL ADVERTISING INC was involved in an aviation accident near Orange Beach, AL. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The operation of the airplane using unapproved fuels, which resulted in abnormal combustion and subsequent damage to the No. 3 cylinder. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 2026-08-03Data APIEditorial standards

On July 4, 2011, a Cessna 172N performing a banner tow flight nosed over after a forced landing in water near Orange Beach, Alabama. The aircraft sustained substantial damage; both pilots were uninjured. Examination revealed a mixture of automotive fuel and 100LL in the right tank, and engine damage consistent with incipient melting.

Accident Overview

On July 4, 2011, about 1430 central daylight time, a Cessna 172N, registration N109DP, operated by Gulf Coast Aerial Advertising, Inc., nosed over during a forced landing in water near Orange Beach, Alabama. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time, and no flight plan was filed for the 14 CFR Part 91 banner tow flight from Resort Airport (0AL1), Foley, Alabama. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and the airline transport pilot and commercial second pilot were not injured.

Flight Details

The flight departed from 0AL1 about 1400 with 48 gallons of 100LL fuel. At approximately the return point of the planned route, the pilot-in-command (PIC) noticed a loss of engine rpm and a small vibration. Attempts to resolve the issues were unsuccessful, and the engine continued losing power. The pilot released the banner and maneuvered toward Wolf Field, but was unable to land there. He then executed a forced landing in water near Walker Island. After touchdown, the airplane nosed over.

Examination Findings

The airframe and engine were examined by an FAA airworthiness inspector. The left fuel tank contained 100LL fuel, while the fuel selector was positioned to the right tank, which contained a mixture of 100LL and automotive fuel, with the latter predominating. No placards specifying the grade of automotive fuel were noted by either fuel filler cap. Inspection of the fuel strainer and carburetor revealed the presence of automotive fuel.

Engine examination revealed damage to the No. 3 cylinder around the bottom spark plug. No discrepancies were found with the powertrain, air induction, or lubrication systems. Spark plugs except the No. 3 exhibited dark discoloration consistent with a rich fuel-to-air ratio. The magnetos were properly timed. The No. 3 bottom ignition lead was heat damaged near the bottom spark plug. The No. 3 cylinder was removed for further examination.

Engine and Fuel Analysis

The operator’s on-airport fuel tank had been serviced with 87 octane automotive fuel containing 10 percent ethanol and regionally adjusted additives. No fuel samples were obtained.

Examination of the No. 3 cylinder and piston by the NTSB Materials Laboratory revealed the piston crown had flaky brittle spatter material. About 25 percent of material around the threaded spark plug insert ring was obliterated. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of white spatter contamination showed compounds high in carbon and oxygen, plus elements expected in cylinder head casting material. The cylinder head material near the bottom spark plug hole was consistent with specified casting material, and its microstructure showed incipient melting. No manufacturing defects were reported.

The airplane was equipped with a Lycoming O-360-A4M engine (180 hp), converted from an O-320-E2D (150 hp). The O-360-A4M requires 100LL fuel minimum. Supplemental type certificates (STCs) SA2600CE and SE2563CE allowed use of automotive fuel, with minimum 91 octane, intermixing with avgas approved, but alcohol-containing fuel not approved. Placards at each fuel filler opening are required, specifying that alcohol is not allowed.

Maintenance Records

The last 100-hour inspection was signed off on the day of the accident, performed by the PIC, who holds an A&P certificate with Inspection Authorization. The same person modified the airplane in 2009 to allow automotive fuel. The airplane had operated about 2.0 hours since the inspection.

Contributing factors

Causes

Recip eng cyl section — FailureFluid type

Other contributing factors

Inadequate inspectionNot serviced/maintained

All Cessna 172 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 4 Jul 2011 CESSNA 172N accident near Orange Beach, AL?

On July 4, 2011, a Cessna 172N performing a banner tow flight nosed over after a forced landing in water near Orange Beach, Alabama. The aircraft sustained substantial damage; both pilots were uninjured. Examination revealed a mixture of automotive fuel and 100LL in the right tank, and engine damage consistent with…

Were there any fatalities in the 4 Jul 2011 CESSNA 172N accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 4 Jul 2011 involved a CESSNA 172N, registration N109DP, operated by GULF COAST AERIAL ADVERTISING INC, at Orange Beach, AL.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

The operation of the airplane using unapproved fuels, which resulted in abnormal combustion and subsequent damage to the No. 3 cylinder. Contributing to the accident was the inadequate 100-hour inspection because the mechanic failed to note the lack of placards by either fuel filler cap specifying the minimum…