No fatalities

Floatplane Incident During Takeoff from Lake

Grand Marais, MN, United States

On August 27, 2011, a CESSNA 182C was involved in an aviation accident near Grand Marais, MN. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The pilot's delayed decision to land the airplane when he realized the airplane's performance was insufficient to clear approaching terrain during the initial climb after takeoff. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequate preflight planning. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 2026-08-03Data APIEditorial standards

A scenic flight floatplane experienced insufficient airspeed after becoming airborne, leading to a forced landing attempt that resulted in a nose-over. Postaccident examination found no anomalies; the pilot noted the aircraft was at gross weight.

Incident Overview

A local scenic flight departed from a lake in a southeasterly direction. The wind was reported at 8 knots from the south/southeast. Shortly after becoming airborne to approximately 100 feet above ground level, the pilot observed that the airplane's airspeed was not increasing as expected, and the airplane was not climbing.

Pilot Actions

In an attempt to increase airspeed and ultimately gain altitude, the pilot lowered the nose, but the airspeed did not increase. Due to the terrain ahead of the airplane, the pilot attempted a landing on the remaining lake area. During the attempted landing, the airplane's floats contacted terrain located between the main lake and a bay, causing the airplane to nose over.

Postaccident Examination

Examination of the airplane after the accident revealed substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. No anomalies were found with the airframe or engine.

Pilot's Comments

The pilot estimated that the weight and balance of the airplane was at the gross weight limitation. The pilot reported that safety margins could have been increased by using all available back-taxi distance and more conservative abort points.

Contributing factors

Climb rate — Not attained/maintainedPilot