10 May 2012: BEECH C90 — DOI Bureau of Land Management

10 May 2012: BEECH C90 (N14CP) — DOI Bureau of Land Management

No fatalities • Boise, ID, United States

Probable cause

Excessive loading on the left wing, which occurred over a period of time. Contributing to the accident was maintenance personnel’s failure to adequately inspect and document the left wing damage.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On January 28, 2013, the National Transportation Safety Board was notified that a Beech King Air C90, N14CP, while on contract from Dynamic Aviation to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), sustained substantial damage to the left wing at an undetermined time and location. BLM was operating the airplane under an exclusive contract as a public aircraft between April 2, 2012, and October 21, 2012. During a post contract inspection on January 21, 2013, substantial damage to the left wing was discovered. There were no reported injuries during this time frame.

The accident airplane was on an exclusive use contract to be primarily used in BLM fire management activities in the low-level lead airplane and air attack missions. BLM provided the pilots and crew. Dynamic Aviation provided the airplane and maintenance personnel.

During the term of the contract, the airplane had been operated for a total of 318 hours, which consisted of 113 flights; 110 flights were flown by the BLM pilot, and 3 flights, which totaled 5.2 hours, were flown by the relief BLM pilot.

About May 10, 2012, government pilots and the contract mechanic first observed deformation/wrinkles to the left wing outboard of the nacelle. The mechanic inspected the area, and after consultation with company supervisors, it was decided to monitor the area for further damage. No entries were made in the maintenance logbooks.

On August 15, 2012, the BLM pilot reported to a relief mechanic that he had encountered moderate turbulence and requested the mechanic perform a "turbulent air inspection." The mechanic reported to the pilot that he had completed the turbulent air inspection and found nothing.

The BLM pilot stated that when the primary mechanic returned, he stated that the wrinkle appeared to be a little worse. No further action was taken, and the airplane continued to fly under the contract until October 31, 2012.

A review of the airplane records showed no entries by either of the pilots or maintenance personnel regarding the noted damage to the left wing.

On November 9, 2012, the airplane was flown from Boise, Idaho, to Redmond, California, and returned to the control of Dynamic Aviation.

On December 10, 2012, maintenance personnel discovered the damage to the left wing and observed that it had progressed since previous observations.

The Hawker Beechcraft repair design office was sent photographs and a description of the damage to have an assessment completed. The assessment revealed that "the damage was consistent with conditions known to exist when the wing assembly has experienced loading in excess of normal operating limits." It was determined that the left outer wing assembly would need to be replaced with a new or serviceable assembly.

The Department of the Interior Office of Aviation Services conducted a mishap investigation and submitted a report of the findings on May 17, 2013; a copy of the report is included in the accident docket.

As a result of the investigation of this accident, it was determined that the contractor did possess the required FAR 135 certificate, and the contracted airplane was properly certificated for the contract. However, the contracted airplane was neither on the contractors FAR 135 certificate, nor was it required to be under the contract. The Department of the Interior will require that contracted aircraft to be on the contractor's FAR 135 certificate and/or in the Operations Specifications as appropriate.

Also, the Department of the Interior now requires load monitoring equipment on various aircraft to monitor the dynamic loads during low-level flight operations.

Contributing factors

  • cause Capability exceeded
  • factor Inadequate inspection
  • factor Maintenance personnel
  • factor Maintenance personnel
  • factor Related records

Conditions

Weather
Unk

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.