No fatalities

31 Jul 2012: BOEING 737-924ER (N37420) — UNITED AIR LINES INC — Denver, CO

Denver, CO, United States

On 31 Jul 2012, a BOEING 737-924ER (registration N37420) operated by UNITED AIR LINES INC was involved in an aviation accident near Denver, CO. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: An in-flight collision with a bird during descent to land, which resulted in damage to the left pitot tube and loss of airspeed information to the left and right primary flight displays (PFD). This summary draws on records from NTSB; 17 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards
BOEING 737-924ER
Photo: San Diego Air & Space Museum Archives / Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

On July 31, 2012, United Airlines flight 1475 struck a White Faced Ibis during approach to Denver, damaging radome, pitot tube, and stabilizer. No injuries; crew declared emergency and landed uneventfully.

Incident Overview

On July 31, 2012, at approximately 0909 mountain daylight time, a Boeing 737-924ER (registration N37420) operating as United Airlines flight 1475 struck a large bird while approaching Denver International Airport (DEN), Colorado. The aircraft was registered to Continental Airlines, Inc., and operated by United Airlines under 14 CFR Part 121 as a domestic passenger flight originating from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) at 0818. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and the flight operated on an instrument flight rules flight plan.

Crew Actions

The flight crew reported hearing a loud bang from the front of the airplane during descent, believed at the time to be a bird strike. Following the strike, the captain's airspeed and altimeter became inoperative, while the first officer's airspeed and altitude indications were erratic. The crew referenced standby instruments, but the readings did not align with the aircraft's altitude and power settings. The captain initially lost airspeed and altitude indication and eventually lost all instrument indications. The crew used power settings, aircraft configurations, and air traffic control (ATC) callouts of ground speed to continue the flight to DEN, where an uneventful landing was made. The operator later reported that the captain stated the standby airspeed indicator readings during descent seemed to match the ground speed callouts provided by ATC.

Aircraft Damage

Examination of the airplane after the incident revealed a large hole in the radome on the nose, measuring about 12 by 24 inches. A portion of the broken radome lodged on the left pitot tube, which was bent. Bird remains were found within the left engine and on the tail. Subsequent examination identified the bird species as a White Faced Ibis. No injuries were reported.

Air Data System Details

The airplane was equipped with three separate and independent air data systems: left, right, and standby. Each used independent sensors and displays, though some comparative display messages relied on data from both left and right systems. The flight data recorder (FDR) computed airspeed and altitude from the left ADIRU, based on sensed data from the left pitot probe and static ports. The right ADIRU and standby system data were not recorded by the FDR.

FDR data showed a rapid loss of airspeed while descending through approximately 11,500 feet pressure altitude at a computed airspeed of about 290 knots. Many air data parameters exhibited erroneous behavior: airspeed dropped to 45 knots, wind data decreased to zero, and pressure altitude increased. The left angle of attack measurement diverged from the right by about 0.5 degrees. The rapid drop to the "no computed data" (NCD) value of 45 knots was consistent with a complete loss of pitot pressure on the left air data system. According to the airplane manufacturer, this would have been consistent with an amber "SPD" flag on the left primary flight display.

Post-Incident Testing

Testing of the airplane's air data systems after replacement of the left pitot tube and system cleaning did not reveal any anomalies that would explain the loss of all instrument indications described by the captain or the reported unreliability of the first officer's airspeed and altitude indications.

Contributing factors

Effect on operation