No fatalities

8 Jul 2013: CESSNA 120 — Daniel B David — Lakeville, MN

Lakeville, MN, United States

On 8 Jul 2013, a CESSNA 120 operated by Daniel B David was involved in an aviation accident near Lakeville, MN. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The student pilot's excessive application of the brakes during the landing roll and the flight instructor's delayed remedial action, which resulted in a nose-over. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

During tailwheel training, a student pilot's second landing resulted in a swerve and nose-over after the instructor took control and brakes were applied, causing substantial damage.

Incident Overview

A flight instructor was providing tailwheel training to a private pilot who had no prior tailwheel experience. The incident occurred during the second landing attempt. The tailwheel contacted the runway first, followed by a slight bounce, after which the airplane landed on all three landing gear.

Loss of Directional Control

According to the instructor, the airplane began to swerve left and right immediately after touchdown. The student did not apply the necessary corrections, prompting the instructor to take over the flight controls. During the recovery effort, the brakes were applied, causing the airplane to nose over and come to rest inverted on the runway.

Brake Application Discrepancy

The flight instructor stated that he did not recall touching the brakes during the recovery. He speculated that the student might have inadvertently applied the brakes, leading to the nose-over.

Aircraft Damage and Examination

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and empennage. The instructor reported that no mechanical malfunctions or failures were present prior to the accident. A postaccident examination conducted by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector found no evidence of preaccident mechanical issues that would have prevented normal operation.

Conclusion

The incident occurred during a routine training flight with no reported mechanical anomalies. The exact sequence of brake application remains unclear, but the outcome was a nose-over and substantial damage to the aircraft.

Contributing factors

Causes

Pilot

Other contributing factors

Instructor/check pilot