No fatalities

Total Loss of Engine Power Leads to Forced Landing in Long View, North Carolina (N246JT)

Long View, NC, United States

On January 6, 2015, a BEECH V35B (registration N246JT) operated by Jayson Jarvis was involved in an aviation accident near Long View, NC. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: The improper installation of the lower rear crankshaft counterweight snap rings by unknown maintenance personnel, which resulted in the separation of the counterweight and a subsequent total loss of engine power during initial climb. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 2026-08-03Data APIEditorial standards

On January 6, 2015, a Beech V35B experienced a total loss of engine power during initial climb from Hickory Regional Airport, resulting in a forced landing into trees. The pilot sustained serious injuries; three passengers incurred minor injuries.

Accident Overview

On January 6, 2015, at approximately 1710 eastern standard time, a Beech V35B, registration N246JT, operated by a private individual, was substantially damaged during a forced landing into trees in Long View, North Carolina. The aircraft had just departed Hickory Regional Airport (HKY) in Hickory, North Carolina, on a personal flight to Pitt-Greenville Airport (PGV) in Greenville, North Carolina. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed.

Pilot Statement

The pilot reported that during the initial climb, at about 300 feet above ground level, he heard a loud bang followed by a total loss of engine power. He then performed a forced landing straight ahead into trees.

Wreckage Examination

Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed substantial damage to the fuselage. The inspector also noted a hole in the engine case near the No. 2 cylinder.

Engine Teardown Examination

A teardown examination of the engine was performed at a recovery facility under the supervision of an NTSB investigator. The examination revealed that the lower rear crankshaft counterweight had separated and the No. 1 connecting rod had separated. Oil was present throughout the engine, and there was no evidence of lack of lubrication. The No. 2 cylinder, crankshaft, and camshaft could not be separated from the engine case half for examination due to rotational damage that occurred following the separation of the crankshaft counterweight. These components were forwarded to the manufacturer's facility for further examination.

At the manufacturer's facility, further examination under NTSB supervision revealed that all four snap rings from the lower rear crankshaft counterweight were found loose in the engine, with one ring separated in half. Three of the lower rear counterweight retaining plates were found, but the fourth was not recovered. For comparison, two snap rings on the upper rear crankshaft counterweight were examined. According to the manufacturer's mandatory service bulletin (MSB 99-3C), the minimum width between the snap ring ears must be 0.179 inch or more; a smaller width indicates a snap ring not properly seated. For one of the two upper rear counterweight snap rings, a 0.179 inch gap gauge could not be inserted due to less space between the ears. However, after the snap ring was removed and its groove cleaned with a wire brush, it seated properly when reinstalled, and the gauge then fit.

Maintenance History

Review of maintenance records showed that the airplane's most recent annual inspection was completed on July 16, 2014. At that time, the airframe had accumulated 3,394 total hours of operation. The engine was a factory rebuild in 1998 and had accumulated 1,561 total hours at the time of the annual inspection. The airplane flew about 46 hours from the inspection until the accident. Maintenance records also indicated the engine received a top overhaul in 2006 and that the crankshaft was inspected in June 1999 in accordance with airworthiness directive 99-09-17. The manufacturer's Service Bulletin MSB 99-3C includes a warning that not properly installing counterweight retaining plates and snap rings may result in engine damage and possible failure.

Contributing factors

Recip engine power section — FailureMaintenance personnelIncorrect service/maintenance