No fatalities

Student Pilot Nose-Over During Aborted Landing

Palm Springs, CA, United States

On August 3, 2016, a CESSNA 172 S operated by M.I. AIR Corp. was involved in an aviation accident near Palm Springs, CA. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: It is likely that the student pilot did not counteract the left turning tendencies with sufficient right rudder after power was added to abort the landing. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 2026-08-03Data APIEditorial standards

During the landing roll, a solo student pilot drifted right, applied left rudder, then aborted and added full power. The airplane veered left, departed the runway, and nosed over, causing substantial damage to the vertical stabilizer and both wings. No mechanical malfunctions were reported.

Accident Details

A solo student pilot was conducting a landing. During the landing roll, the airplane drifted to the right of the runway centerline. The pilot applied left rudder to correct the drift. He then decided to abort the landing and applied full power. Subsequently, the airplane veered to the left, departed the runway, and nosed over in rough terrain. The student pilot reported that the airplane remained at full power through the nose-over.

Aircraft Damage

The vertical stabilizer and both wings sustained substantial damage.

Pilot Report

The student pilot did not report any mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Probable Cause

According to the Federal Aviation Administration Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, "torque" (the left turning tendency of the airplane) is made up of four elements: torque reaction from engine and propeller, corkscrewing effect of the slipstream, gyroscopic action of the propeller, and asymmetric loading of the propeller (P-factor). It is likely that the student pilot did not counteract the left turning tendencies with sufficient right rudder after power was added to abort the landing.

Contributing factors

Causes

Student/instructed pilotDirectional control — Not attained/maintained

Other contributing factors

Contributed to outcome

All Cessna 172 accidents →

Frequently asked questions

What happened in the 3 Aug 2016 CESSNA 172 S accident near Palm Springs, CA?

During the landing roll, a solo student pilot drifted right, applied left rudder, then aborted and added full power. The airplane veered left, departed the runway, and nosed over, causing substantial damage to the vertical stabilizer and both wings. No mechanical malfunctions were reported.

Were there any fatalities in the 3 Aug 2016 CESSNA 172 S accident?

No fatalities were recorded in this accident.

What aircraft was involved and where did it happen?

The accident on 3 Aug 2016 involved a CESSNA 172 S, operated by M.I. AIR Corp., at Palm Springs, CA.

What was the probable cause of the accident?

It is likely that the student pilot did not counteract the left turning tendencies with sufficient right rudder after power was added to abort the landing.