28 Feb 2019: SIKORSKY HH-60L — Arista Aviation

28 Feb 2019: SIKORSKY HH-60L (N260MW) — Arista Aviation

No fatalities • TULLAHOMA, TN, United States

Probable cause

The flight crew’s improper decision to continue the VFR flight into deteriorating weather conditions, which resulted in a collision with trees during a subsequent precautionary landing attempt.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On February 28, 2019, about 1500 central standard time, a Sikorsky HH-60L, N260MW, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Tullahoma, Tennessee. The two pilots received serious injuries. The helicopter was operated as a 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 repositioning flight.

The purpose of the flight was to reposition the helicopter for maintenance and inspection. The special airworthiness certificate and ferry flight permit were issued for the flight from Enterprise Municipal Airport (EDN), Enterprise, Alabama, to THA, which included a restriction for visual flight rules (VFR) operation.

According to the pilot-in-command, the crew departed EDN earlier that morning, destined for THA. It was a route they had “flown many times and were familiar with” and “VFR conditions were expected along the entire route of flight from point departure to destination.” They had stopped at Scottsboro Municipal Airport, Alabama (4A6), which was about 42 miles from the destination, for fuel and lunch. He recalled that the weather at that time appeared to be clear. He did not report receiving an updated weather briefing while at 4A6. They departed from 4A6 at 1400 with no issues. While enroute to THA, the pilot recalled that they had “encountered severe heavy rain, moderate turbulence, along with rapidly deteriorating visibility. We descended to approximately 100 ft AGL to maintain visual contact with the ground. When VFR flight conditions were no longer possible, we executed a turn and attempted to land the helicopter in an open field.” He said there were no problems or issues with the helicopter and did not recall any further details about the accident sequence.

A witness located about 1/2 nautical mile from the accident site was outside her home when she heard the sound of a helicopter nearby. She could not see the helicopter due to the clouds, and she noted that it was raining lightly at the time. She said the helicopter sounded “really loud and low, as if it were trying to land behind her house.” She heard the helicopter for about 30 seconds before hearing a loud “whump whump” sound followed by a loud boom.

Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector revealed that all major components of the helicopter were present at the accident site. The fuselage came to rest on its left side and nearly inverted, at the edge of a wooded area. The majority of the tailboom was in an adjacent tree about 30 ft above the ground. The main rotor blades were all separated from the hub, fragmented, and strewn across an area about 100 yards in diameter. The 1455 weather conditions reported at the THA, located about 2.5 nautical miles northeast of the accident site at an elevation of 1,084 ft mean sea level (msl), included an overcast cloud ceiling at 300 ft above ground level (agl), visibility 2.5 statute miles in mist, temperature 13° C, dew point 12° C. The visibility had reduced to 1 mile at the next recorded observation at 1515. A review of the graphical aviation forecast issued by the National Weather Service at 1302 revealed that overcast skies were expected in the area around the time of the accident with cloud bases at 1,100 ft msl and tops at 9,000 ft msl. Two airmen’s meteorological information advisories were issued at 1200 and 1500, warning of instrument meteorological conditions expected in the area of the accident.

Contributing factors

  • Flight crew
  • Decision related to condition
  • Decision related to condition

Conditions

Weather
IMC, wind 310/05kt, vis 2.5sm

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.