No fatalities

4 May 2019: Piper PA28R 200 (N2134T) — Winter Haven, FL

Winter Haven, FL, United States

On 4 May 2019, a Piper PA28R 200 (registration N2134T) was involved in an aviation accident near Winter Haven, FL. No fatalities were reported. Investigators recorded the probable cause as: A partial loss of engine power due to worn fuel valve O-rings, which allowed air into the fuel system and resulted in a forced landing to unsuitable terrain. This summary draws on records from NTSB; 12 related events involving the same aircraft type or operator are linked below.

SourcesNTSBPrimary reportUpdated 1778583330Data APIEditorial standards

On May 4, 2019, a Piper PA-28R-200 (N2134T) experienced an engine power fluctuation during an instructional flight near Bartow, Florida. The flight instructor executed a forced landing to a field, resulting in substantial damage to the left wing. No injuries occurred.

Accident Overview

On May 4, 2019, at about 1100 Eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28R-200 airplane, registration N2134T, was substantially damaged during a forced landing near Bartow, Florida. The flight instructor and the pilot receiving instruction were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight.

Flight and Forced Landing

The flight proceeded south to a normal practice area where steep turns, slow flight, and stalls were performed. Subsequently, the airplane headed north to intercept the initial approach fix for a simulated instrument approach. According to the flight instructor, as they flew toward the initial approach fix, the engine experienced a power fluctuation. The flight instructor switched fuel tanks and turned on the fuel pump, but shortly thereafter, the engine began to sputter. The instructor decided to land at Winter Haven Regional Airport (GIF) in Winter Haven, Florida, but was unable to reach the runway. A forced landing was accomplished to an open field, about 2 miles northeast of GIF. During the landing sequence, the airplane’s left wing sustained substantial damage when the landing gear struck a rut in the field.

Post-Accident Engine Examination

Examination of the engine revealed no anomalies that would have prevented the normal production of power. The airplane was secured for an engine run. The battery was charged, and a fuel source was secured to the right tank fuel line leading into the fuel selector. The engine started uneventfully but subsequently surged and stopped. An external fuel tank was then secured inside the cockpit to manually pump the primer ball and allow pressure in the system. The ball was pumped four times, and fuel was observed leaking out of the top two vents (weep holes) in the fuel selector. There were no fuel stains or evidence of a fuel leak observed on the fuel selector valve before the engine run.

Fuel Selector Analysis

The fuel selector was removed, and the external fuel source was connected directly to the fuel line past where the fuel selector would be situated. The engine was started and run at various low to medium power settings, with no anomalies noted. The fuel selector was then subjected to pressure tests and examination. Pressure bench checks of the fuel selector valve were accomplished in accordance with Piper Service Letter No. 1273, dated March 29, 2021. The valve was pressurized to the appropriate psi and checked for leaks; it passed the test with no leaks observed. A second pressure test was performed with the valve’s left and right outlet ports capped. A relatively small amount of fuel leaked around the shaft when positioned to the off position. However, when positioned to the left or right positions, a substantial fuel leak occurred. Another exemplar fuel valve was tested in a similar manner and no leaks were observed.

The fuel valve was disassembled to examine the housing, shaft, and O-rings for any potential damage or wear. No corrosion or damage was observed to the housing or shaft. Microscopic examination of the four O-rings revealed that the No. 3 and No. 4 O-rings appeared to have frictional interactions with the inner surface of the housing bore. Additionally, the No. 1 and No. 2 O-rings exhibited wear on the surfaces in contact with the inner surface of the housing bore. No additional anomalies were noted.

Contributing factors

Damaged/degradedEffect on equipment