5 Jun 2020: Piper PA 30 No Series

5 Jun 2020: Piper PA 30 No Series (N8244Y) — Unknown operator

No fatalities • Salem, OR, United States

Probable cause

A fatigue failure of the right main landing gear trunnion.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On June 4, 2020, at 1821 Pacific daylight time, a Piper PA30 airplane, N8244Y, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at Salem, Oregon. The pilot and passenger were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that after departure, he raised the landing gear and heard an unusual "clunk," but the landing gear retraction light illuminated normally and the mirror on the left engine nacelle indicated that the nose gear was retracted. The pilot continued the flight, and as the airplane neared the destination airport, he lowered the landing gear. The green “down and locked” light did not illuminate, and the nose landing gear door was open, but the nose landing gear was not extended. The pilot climbed the airplane and began to troubleshoot the issue, including performing the emergency gear extension procedure; however, “the system was totally jammed.” The pilot diverted to a nearby airport, where he performed a flyby, and ground personnel indicated that the main landing gear was partially extended, and the nose landing gear was not extended. The pilot landed the airplane and he and the passenger egressed without injury. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the keel beam and the right-wing spar. Postaccident examination revealed that the right main landing gear trunnion was fractured. The trunnion was removed from the airplane and sent to the NTSB Materials Laboratory for analysis. The fracture surfaces had been forced together and taped before receipt by the laboratory, which inhibited examination. Most of the undamaged portions of the fracture surfaces exhibited a rough, fibrous texture with a dull luster. The inner mating fracture surface was less damaged and was sectioned below the fracture surface to facilitate further examination. The sectioned portion was examined with a scanning electron microscope. Most of the surface exhibited features consistent with overstress fracture; however, there were two opposite facing areas exhibiting flatter, darker features. These areas were located at a tapered area where the trunnion and gusset were joined and showed evidence of fatigue striations that were consistent with having propagated from the outside surface inward. Due to post-fracture damage, only one crack initiation site was able to be observed, and this site exhibited an inward concave geometry inconsistent with a corrosion pit or pore. The cross-sectional thickness of the tapered area in which the evidence of fatigue was found was measured as 0.4 inches. In contrast, the welded gusset was 0.8 inches thick, and the boss exhibited a diameter of 1.75 inches. This configuration would introduce a stress concentration at the locations of the fatigue cracking. The presence of two opposite-facing fatigue cracks was consistent with reverse bending fatigue, suggestive of the gusset bending back and forth at the interface. Once these fatigue cracks had propagated far enough into the boss cross section, the remainder of the part fractured under overstress during the last landing. The chemical composition of the sectioned trunnion was examined using x-ray fluorescence (XRF) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). From the data obtained using these techniques, the trunnion was found to be consistent with an AA 2014 aluminum alloy. The hardness and conductivity met specifications consistent with peak hardened temper for this alloy. The welded gusset however, exhibited a different chemical composition. The composition was consistent with an aluminum casting or welding alloy. The electrical conductivity was higher, and the hardness was softer than the Rockwell B scale and was, therefore, not measured conclusively. The hardness of the boss material was found to decrease as it was probed closer to the weld. These data were consistent with the boss being locally softened due to the heat inputs from the welding process.

Contributing factors

  • Fatigue/wear/corrosion
  • Gear extension and retract sys — Failure

Conditions

Weather
VMC, wind 000/06kt, vis 10sm

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.