16 Aug 2021: CESSNA 208 B — WRIGHT AIR SERVICE INC

16 Aug 2021: CESSNA 208 B (N97HA) — WRIGHT AIR SERVICE INC

No fatalities • Fairbanks, AK, United States

Probable cause

The pilot’s unexpected encounter with supercooled liquid droplets (SLD), which resulted in a loss of control due to ice accumulation. Contributing to the accident were: (1) the pilot’s failure to maintain the minimum airspeed for flight in icing conditions, (2) the pilot’s failure to disconnect the autopilot every 10 minutes to check for ice buildup, (3) the overweight airplane, (4) the lack of an SLD forecast product for the state of Alaska, and (5) the Federal Aviation Administration's failure to require weight and balance documentation for each flight in Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 single-engine operations.

— NTSB Determination

Accident narrative

On August 16, 2021, about 1452 Alaska daylight time, a Cessna 208B, N97HA, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Fairbanks, Alaska. The pilot and eight passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 CFR Part 135 scheduled commuter flight. According to the pilot, Wright Air Service flight 440 departed about 1424 from the Fairbanks International Airport (FAI), destined for Huslia, Alaska (HLA), located about 220 miles west-northwest of FAI. The pilot reported that after departure, she climbed the airplane to her assigned altitude of 10,000 ft msl, where she encountered “light rime” icing conditions. To exit the icing conditions, she requested and was assigned a block altitude from 10,000 to 12,000 ft msl. She subsequently climbed the airplane to 10,500 ft msl. She was unable to exit the icing condition and elected to begin a gradual descent back to 10,000 ft msl. She added that instrument meteorological conditions prevailed and that the autopilot was engaged. The pilot also noted that while en route, the airplane’s deicing boots and heated propeller were operating normally by removing ice accumulations. She reported that while in a gradual descent from 10,500 ft msl to 10,000 ft msl, the autopilot suddenly disengaged without warning, and the airplane entered an abrupt uncommanded right bank followed by a steep, nose-down, spiraling descent. The pilot said that during the upset, it felt as if the aileron controls were jammed as she tried to regain control of the airplane. After regaining control of the airplane, she declared an emergency to air traffic control and subsequently made an emergency landing at FAI. Flight track data revealed that after departing FAI, the flight proceeded to the west-northwest for about 47 nautical miles cruising at an altitude of about 10,000 ft msl. Before the upset, a climb was initiated, and the flight reached an altitude of about 10,700 ft msl before descending to about 10,300 ft msl followed by an inflight upset with abrupt changes to altitude and speed. (See figure – Flight track.)

Figure - Flight track.

The Fairbanks upper air soundings indicated cloud cover was likely from 3,000 ft msl through 18,000 ft msl with moderate icing above 9,500 ft msl and the freezing level around 6,440 ft msl. The NWS Fairbanks/Pedro Dome (PAPD) weather radar depicted light to moderate precipitation moving southwest to northeast across the flight path throughout the accident flight with very light precipitation located near the accident location at the accident time. Experimental satellite cross section information further supplemented the Fairbanks sounding icing data, indicating supercooled liquid water located within the clouds from 7,000 ft msl through 13,000 ft msl between 1447 and 1500. Both the NWS Forecast Icing Product (FIP) and the NWS Current Icing Product (CIP) indicated a 30% to 60% chance of trace to moderate icing in the accident region; the CIP indicated an unknown probability of SLD between 8,000 ft msl and 11,000 ft msl at 1500. Additional information received from the National Center for Atmospheric Research indicated favorable conditions for SLD. Several passengers on the flight provided their observations about the weather conditions. One of the passengers stated that around the time of the upset, the airplane felt like it was getting “slammed with ice” and in turbulence; this passenger viewed chunks or sheets of ice flying past the airframe while in descent after the initial upset. Another passenger stated that before the upset, there was ice built up on the front windshield, and they noticed “heavy moisture” on the strut throughout the entire flight. A third passenger stated that they observed snow and ice building up on their side window before the upset and that the accumulation was thick enough that they could not see through it. A postflight examination of the airplane revealed substantial damage to the wings and right aileron. The examination revealed no evidence of preaccident mechanical malfunctions or anomalies with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Flight control continuity was confirmed from the cockpit to all control surfaces. Additionally, testing of the autopilot and deice systems did not reveal any anomalies.

A review of the airplane’s pilot operating handbook (POH) and applicable supplements revealed that flight in freezing rain, freezing drizzle, mixed conditions, or conditions defined as severe were prohibited. In addition, the minimum speed for flight in icing conditions with the flaps up was 130 knots indicated airspeed with a maximum weight of 8,550 lbs. The POH further stated, “the autopilot must be disconnected once every 10 minutes in icing conditions to check for any out-of-trim conditions caused by ice buildup.”

Data obtained from the Garmin GFC 600 autopilot revealed that the autopilot was not disconnected every 10 minutes through the course of the flight as required. The indicated air speed was consistently below 130 knots, and it was below 100 knots in the seconds preceding the upset. The low airspeed alert activated at 107 kts about 16 minutes, 5 minutes and 2 1/2 minutes before the upset, respectively. A review of the data did not identify any unexpected operation of the autopilot.

According to the weight and balance information for the airplane dated February 3, 2021, the basic empty weight of the airplane in the seating configuration of the accident flight was 5,202.5 lbs with a center of gravity of 188.2 inches. At the airplane’s maximum takeoff gross weight of 9,062 lbs, the center of gravity range was 200.23 inches to 204.35 inches. At the airplane’s maximum takeoff gross weight for flight into known icing conditions of 8,550 lbs, the center of gravity range was 197 inches to 204 inches. The airplane’s weight and balance at the time of the accident was estimated using the weight of the pilot from her most recent FAA medical examination (115 lbs) and the weights provided by the operator for the passengers and their baggage (1,606 lbs and 832 lbs, respectively). The pilot stated that the airplane departed with about 1,900 lbs of fuel. Assuming an average fuel burn of about 360 lbs/hr, about 30 minutes of flight time before the upset, and allowing for additional fuel burned during takeoff and initial climb, fuel onboard at the time of the accident was about 1,700 lbs. The gross weight of the airplane at the time of the accident, without accounting for the weight of any ice accumulation, was about 9,420 lbs, and the center of gravity was about 199.8 inches. Previous Related Recommendations During its investigation of this accident, the NTSB determined that the airplane encountered SLD. The pilot stated that before the accident flight, she reviewed weather information from several sources, including “multiple pages” on the NWS Alaska Aviation Weather Unit (AAWU) website. The NWS Aviation Weather Center (AWC) produces graphical forecast products (the CIP and the FIP)that depict the potential for significant icing, including SLD conditions, for the contiguous United States. However, a product depicting SLD was not available for the state of Alaska, and if it had been, the accident may have been avoided. As a result, the NTSB issued the following recommendations: Safety Recommendation A-22-21 asked the FAA, in collaboration with the NWS, to develop a graphical forecast showing the potential for SLD icing conditions in Alaska and make this information available to pilots. Safety Recommendation A-22-22 asked the NWS to work with the FAA to develop a graphical forecast depicting potential areas of SLD icing conditions in Alaska and make this information available to pilots. Although neither Part 135 nor Wright Air Service’s Operations Specifications required the operator to physically document the weight and balance for any flights conducted in the company's single-engine airplanes, 14 CFR 135.63 requires that operators using multiengine aircraft are "responsible for the preparation and accuracy of a load manifest in duplicate containing information concerning the loading of the aircraft." This load manifest must be prepared before each flight and include, among other items, the number of passengers, total weight of the loaded aircraft, the maximum allowable takeoff weight, and the center of gravity location of the loaded aircraft. Further, one copy of the load manifest is to be carried in the airplane, and the operator is required to keep the records for at least 30 days.

The NTSB attempted to address this exclusion with the issuance of Safety Recommendations A-89-135, A-99-61 and A-15-029, which asked the FAA to amend the record-keeping requirements of 14 CFR 135.63(c) to apply to single-engine as well as multiengine aircraft. The FAA did not take the recommended action, and the NTSB classified Safety Recommendations A-89-135, A-99-61, and A-15-029 "Closed—Unacceptable Action" in 1990, 2014, and 2021, respectively.

Contributing factors

  • Pilot
  • Airspeed — Not attained/maintained
  • Angle of attack — Not attained/maintained
  • Pilot
  • Pilot
  • FAA or designated personnel
  • Awareness of condition
  • Effect on equipment

Conditions

Weather
IMC, wind 170/07kt, vis 5sm

Loading the flight search…

What you can do on Flight Finder

  • Search flights between any two airports with live fares.
  • By aircraft — pick a plane model (e.g. Boeing 787, Airbus A350) and see every route it flies from your origin.
  • Route map — click any airport worldwide to explore its destinations, or draw a radius to find nearby airports.
  • Global aviation safety — aviation accident database, 5,200+ records since 1980, with map and rankings by aircraft and operator.
  • NTSB safety feed — recent U.S. aviation accidents and incidents from the official NTSB CAROL database, updated daily.

Frequently asked questions

How do I search flights by aircraft type on FlightFinder?

Pick an aircraft model — Boeing 737, Airbus A320, A380, Boeing 787 Dreamliner and more — enter your origin airport, and FlightFinder shows every route that plane flies from there with live fares.

Which aircraft types can I filter by?

We support Boeing 737/747/757/767/777/787, the full Airbus A220/A319/A320/A321/A330/A340/A350/A380 family, Embraer E170/E175/E190/E195, Bombardier CRJ and Dash 8, and the ATR 42/72 turboprops.

Is FlightFinder free to use?

Search and schedules are free. Pro ($4.99/month, $39/year, or $99 one-time lifetime) unlocks the enriched flight card — on-time stats, CO₂ per passenger, amenities, live gate & weather — plus My Trips with push alerts.

Where does the route data come from?

Live schedules come from Amadeus, AeroDataBox and Travelpayouts. Observed routes (which aircraft actually flew a given city pair) are crowdsourced from adsb.lol ADS-B data under the Open Database License.